Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:List of Allied forces in the Normandy campaign

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Shouldn't this list maybe include the beaches where the forces were landed (and perhaps sector too)? And there where other nationalities involded too, wheren't there (like Norwegians and Danes)?? Stalwart 20:03, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will be adding a few units to this list when I have time. I will be using Joslen's and Victory in the West to do this. By the way, did the Czech Armoured Brigade arrive in time for Normandy? I don't think so and may remove it unless someone objects.--Caranorn 16:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can now confirm, the Czech Brigade arrived between August 25 and September 1, so too late for the campaign. So I will eventually delete it.--Caranorn 16:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joslen's

[edit]

I added Joslen's to the references. I've noticed some discrepancies between the all ready listed arrival times of some units and those given in Joslen's, which is based on official British records. I haven't changed any of the old data yet, but propose to review all the British arrival dates and where necessary pick the one given by Joslen, which I presume to be the arrival date of the Divisional or Brigade headquarters. I assume some of the currently conflicting dates are based on arrival of units attached to said Headquarters, these I feel should be listed under the individual battalions (I don't have those dates, or at least not in a single source) instead.--Caranorn 16:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Queries

[edit]

To whoever made the effort to rationalise this series of articles:

  1. where's the naval order of battle & description of the naval issues that was originally in Operation Neptune?
  2. several links are circular.

Folks at 137 (talk) 19:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Merge

[edit]

Merging the U.S. Divisions Active in the Normandy Campaign list into this page makes sense. The tables on this page provide more details than the US Division page. The merger would also facilitate including major non-divisional units where appropriate. Acwbuff276 (talk) 17:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I too do not see a problem with merging, but it should be backed up with reliable sources.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Stephen Kirrage talk - contribs 09:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on List of Allied forces in the Normandy Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of Allied forces in the Normandy Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Allied forces in the Normandy Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the British Army Details to Divisional Articles

[edit]

To keep this article in parallel internally, the details in the tables of the British Army units need to be removed to individual divisional articles like with the U.S. divisional listing. Arguments for or against? The other option is to pull the U.S. divisional details into this article.--Bemcfarland (talk) 14:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Title/categorization

[edit]

I found the title very misleading. I fully intended to edit the title but could not figure out how. It should simply say "List of Allied Divisions...." etc. There were hundreds of small unattached brigade, battalion, and even company sized units at d-day. Based on the title/search results, it suggests that those smaller units would be mentioned on this page. People looking for such a page are bound to be disappointed. 2600:8800:116:BC00:9D9F:8EE5:3402:71ED (talk) 03:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]