This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening
Guys, are you sure that it's not too much? Seems rather swanky to me. I can barely handle all sixteen square pixels of explosive colour and cutting-edge detail per thumbnail per rose. --Pitke (talk) 19:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to make some changes to make the list easier to view. I am thinking of removing the cultivar name and just having the most popular marketing name, which appears in many of the entries. Its a mix of both and alternate names. I also would like to remove the breed date and the repeat flowering column and possibly make the images larger. The cultivar name, breed date and repeat flowering info can be found in the rose article, if a wiki article exists. I may create more rose articles from this list. I will wait to see if anyone objects to my proposed changes. MauraWen (talk) 15:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MauraWen: Don't remove the cultivar name or the repeat flowering column. Both are interesting and important. The marketing name is required by law. The images are meant to be thumbnails which are enlarged by clicking.
However, the breeder, breed date and AGM date have all been added at a later stage - and in my view they can be removed. They are specialist details which may not be so interesting for the general reader. I agree that the list has become too congested. It was not originally like that. Darorcilmir (talk) 15:32, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
