Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:List of Chinese military texts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Integration

[edit]

Consider integrating the Chinese military texts template into a larger "Chinese Political Realism" template, or confirm or deny my doing so.FourLights (talk) 09:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno, doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Some of the texts listed are more political, but others like Jixiao Xinshu are more technical and have less to do with the political realm. It's sufficient to have separate templates that can be used together as needed for the individual texts. --diff (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I only used the word "political" because otherwise people might think I was talking about paintings. "Realist" by itself is the phrase used by Sinologists. Nonetheless, I am flexible to not integrating them, though the technical nature of a text is a rather bare reason. The Mohists were full of such considerations. The purpose of such texts are, I believe, still quite Realpolitikal.FourLights (talk) 22:56, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Chinese military texts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]