Talk:List of common 3D test models

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of common 3D test models article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Graphic design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: Computer Bottom‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer graphics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Blender (software)#Suzanne|Suzanne]] The anchor (#Suzanne) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should we preview the models?

I figured it would be more useful that just 2D rendered images, but there may be some downside I'm not anticipating. In particular, @Sumanuil: why did you keep the Nefertiti preview but remove the Stanford bunny and Suzanne previews? Arlo James Barnes 03:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because the Stanford bunny one wasn't there, and the Suzanne already had an image. (Nefertiti didn't have any other.) I didn't see the need for two. Maybe just replace the old images with the new ones? Sumanuil. 04:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see. To my mind it's less about old vs. new, but STL vs. render -- one looks pretty but the other is interactive and better represents the models over the particular artistic choices that go into a given 2D render. But perhaps you right that there are too few STLs on Commons to make it worthwhile... I wonder if the nonfree models would qualify for fair-use hosting here, despite the patent clause not holding. Arlo James Barnes 00:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]