Talk:List of eroge

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 12:50, December 27, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Request/idea

Wouldn't a table be more useful than a list? Possible columns: release date, publisher/developer, original name in japanse, english/romaji name, etc. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.46.238.134 (talk) 18:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Shouldn't this article be called "List of Hentai games"? The current title ("List of H games") isn't really meaningful. Peter S. 14:13, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sure it is. We all know what it means. :P --24.130.46.188 09:44, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Redundancy

You have to wonder what the point to this list is when there is already a category, or vice versa. 203.217.22.128 03:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

To make this list rather less redundant, wouldn't it be a good idea to mention which platform the games are released on? List them by platform. After all, I came to this list to look up some games for particular platforms. (I'm involved in a bet to see who can come up with the most obscure console game and I believe the only way to win that bet is to find a hentai game). Wolf ODonnell 21:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and think the list would be more useful with also the year the game was released, the original producer and the distributor of each game. With these informations the player would choose to buy a game based on platform and the year it came up to the stores. Magno.naval (talk) 19:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong links?

Somehow Suigetsu refers to Naruto Character.. not to any game.--SayaMan 21:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

redlinks

this list has too many red links without references. lists on WP should link to subjects notable enough to either already have an article written about them, or a section of an article. if they dont, they should be notable enough that an article is likely to be written in the near future. excess redlinks may mean the list is being used as a lookup for items in a subject area, for people to then go to the web with the item name. thats not what WP is for. I would recommend that anybody adding a red link should indicate notability, with a website, review, description, etc. it should also be listed in the requested article section (wikipedia: requested articles). I will probably take out most of the redlinks, but if others are working on this list, maybe they can provide some more info on at least some of the redlinks. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 22:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed most of the redlinks. i added a few links around black titles in case an article had been written. i did not search WP for alternate spellings and formatting of names. some "series" i left, or shrunk the brackets to not include the word "series", and added links to, in case articles exist for these that i could easily link to (i dont think any showed up, but i tried in good faith). If there are article written for these games i omitted, they can be added back easily. i added reminder tags to only add notable games here, which is standard operating procedure for most lists.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Im back

Since i cleaned up this list, a number of IP's added massive numbers of unlinked games. ive removed them, and restored some hidden text warnings. again, if i removed a game that is notable, or has a WP article, its easy to add back with refs or linkings. Dont add nonotable games, they will be removed.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of eroge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090520042723/http://www.g-collections.com/family-project.html to http://www.g-collections.com/family-project.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of eroge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]