Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Bob Willis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Bob Willis is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 28, 2013Featured list candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 28, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Bob Willis took seven of his 16 five-wicket hauls against Australia, including eight wickets for 43 runs at Headingley in 1981?

Match Drawn

[edit]

In my opinion, the reader does not need to be told this information, when similar information is not given about wins or losses. Two other examples I have looked at are Brett Lee and Ian Botham (both featured lists) which do not see any need to give this information. Input here from other editors would be helpful, as it is clear that Lugnuts does not agree with me. 97rob (talk) 19:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Lugnuts. All readers are not familiar to the term. —Zia Khan 20:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, if this is consensus then I would suggest the other articles (mentioned above, and I'm sure there's more) are updated by someone? Just as an extra point, I probably wouldn't have felt the need to continue to pursue this case at all if I hadn't been threatened on my talk page with a block. 97rob (talk) 21:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Two other examples... ...which do not see any need to give this information". Argumentum ad populum. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:10, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I know that's not the best way to win an argument, but those articles were both Featured Lists, which suggests that many other editors were happy with the article without the inclusion of drawn. However, if it is agreed that this should be included, then these articles, as well as others, need to be edited to include it as well, as there needs to be continuity across these similar articles. 97rob (talk) 10:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any harm in including an explanation for draw since we cannot guarantee that everyone in the world knows about cricket. Vensatry (Ping) 11:35, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Bob Willis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]