Talk:List of mountain peaks of Washington

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Washington Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why a minimum elevation?

Does anyone know why this list imposes a minimum elevation for considering a mountain "major"? That doesn't seem to make much sense, because the top elevation has a lot less to do with the size of a mountain than does its prominence. Even the list of the highest major summits of Colorado, while it ranks peaks by elevation, does not impose a minimum elevation for inclusion in the list. Indeed, the lowest point in the state of Colorado is 3,317 feet, and the mountains rise from plains at nearly a mile of elevation, while Washington's highest ranges rise essentially out of the sea. Thus, while Colorado has dozens of "fourteeners" and Washington only has Rainier, Colorado has only three ultras to Washington's seven. I suggest expanding this list, maintaining summit elevation as the default sort criterion, but removing the minimum elevation threshold for inclusion. W.stanovsky (talk) 00:00, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This answer comes six years too late, but I'll answer nonetheless. These lists do not have a minimum elevation. They do have a minimum topographic prominence of 500 meters (1640 feet). The reason for this is to avoid subpeaks of higher summits. We try to include those summits of greatest interest. Yours aye, Buaidh talk contribs 21:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never too late! We find our way back, don't we. Thanks for the explanation. W.stanovsky (talk) 23:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge question

I have started a discussion about a merge at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mountains#Merge_/_redirect_List_of_mountain_peaks_of_Washington_(state)_with_List_of_mountain_peaks_of_Washington. Natg 19 (talk) 16:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Buaidh talk contribs 21:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Logan omitted

Seems to me the list of the top 100 tallest mountains in WA should include Mount Logan. I wouldn’t want to remove number 100, Mount Washington, so maybe it should be the top 101 tallest mountains. I don’t know much about it and I have never edited a Wikipedia article before.

For what it’s worth, the app Flightradar24 shows Mount Logan (9088 feet) just to the north of Goode Mountain. LarryK6070 (talk) 14:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of mountain passes in Washington (state) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of mountain passes in Washington (state) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]