Talk:Lords, viscounts and dukes of Uzès

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Spelling / identity

Should Emilie de la Rochefoucault, mentioned in the article, actually be Emilie de la Rochefoucauld, related to François de La Rochefoucauld (cardinal) and François de La Rochefoucauld (writer)? – Kieran T ^(talk) 19:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, question answered by looking at the French-language edition of WP. Changing the spelling here. – Kieran T ^(talk) 21:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the list end abruptly?

The title is still extant. Why does the list end in 1802? 71.191.119.35 (talk) 01:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources

I'm slightly troubled by the fact that this page has literally no sources, particularly as the names are all in red so they weren't major historical figures. At the minimum someone should add a "genealogy.net" or similar kind of source, and then that should be supplemented as much as possible by paper sources. E.g. One of the later dukes married an American, I'm sure that would be in a newspaper of the time.

69.159.112.190 (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]