Talk:Lost in Yesterday

Lost in Yesterday has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 4, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lost in Yesterday is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

GA Review

Passed. Medxvo (talk) 20:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lost in Yesterday/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: CatchMe (talk · contribs) 03:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 16:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"the musical project by" - "the musical project of"
"centering in Parker's" - "centering on Parker's"
"The Slow Rush Tour" - "the Slow Rush Tour" in lead and prose
"Australian Triple J Hottest 100, 2020 poll" - "Australian Triple J Hottest 100 of 2020 poll" for consistency with prose
"nostalgia, and Parker's" - I think the comma can be removed here
"singles, and compared" - same here I guess
"It peaked at number 65 in Australia, 78 on the Irish Singles Chart, 80 in Lithuania, 89 on the UK singles chart, and 129 in Portugal" - why do some of the charts have their name stated but the other don't? I think name of the country for Ireland and the United Kingdom would suffice since the preceding sentence already says these are the national charts
"and on the year-end rankings of both charts" - I thought this is confusing since we're saying "peaked" which would require a number, so I suggest replacing "peaked" with "reached" which would justify not adding numbers for the year-end rankings
Refs 10 and 34 require |url-access=limited
Ref 10 requires |url-status=live

Everything else looks good to me, awesome work!! @CatchMe: I'll put this On hold for now. I have a GAN for Dorothea (song) which would benefit from your review if you have time and interest :)) Hope you're doing well. Medxvo (talk) 16:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Medxvo: Thanks for the review! All of your comments are addressed now, I believe. Sorry to bother you but could you do a spot-check and specify the criteria? This would help to my participation on the WikiCup according to this. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 18:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did a spot-check while reviewing and found no problems. A full spot-check is below of this version:

1(a) - OK
2(c) - OK
4 and 5 are OK but they don't seem to verify "the album's fifth track" so I suggest replacing with "the fellow album track" or something
7 and 9 are OK
10(b) - OK
12(b) - OK
12(c) - OK
13(c) - OK
15(a) - OK
15(b) - OK
17 - OK
20 - OK
22 - OK
24 - OK
26 - OK
27 - OK
31 - OK
33(c) - OK
36(c) - OK
37(b) - OK

@CatchMe: I'll wait till the refs 4/5 thing is addressed before passing. Thanks for addressing everything, you've done a great job with the article! :) Medxvo (talk) 19:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I preferred "other album track" so changed to that. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 20:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will ✓ Pass the article now. Congratulations!! Medxvo (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.