Talk:Louis Lambert (novel)

Louis Lambert (novel) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 6, 2010.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 24, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
May 19, 2008	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
May 26, 2008	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 15, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Honoré de Balzac's novel Louis Lambert contains many autobiographical elements relating to his time at an Oratorian school in Vendôme?
Current status: Featured article

Balzac (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Balzac, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BalzacWikipedia:WikiProject BalzacTemplate:WikiProject BalzacBalzac articles

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: 19th century Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by 19th century task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of March 24, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Just one question (not enough for me to place it on hold): "After working in the law…" What does this mean?

2. Factually accurate?: Good references and inline citations.

3. Broad in coverage?: Quite.

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Excellent choices, all free.

I would definitely suggest a trip to good ol' FAC. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Kakofonous (talk) 02:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louis Lambert (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060824220309/http://www.anthropoetics.ucla.edu/ap0601/balzac.htm to http://www.anthropoetics.ucla.edu/ap0601/balzac.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]