Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Lucid (Aṣa album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lucid (Aṣa album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 18:03, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Will review this soon --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:03, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Use bullet points instead of hlist in the infobox  Done
  • Sure you can't find a source for recording date?  Not done I'm not sure exactly what you mean. The release date is sourced in the release history section.
  • Target neo-soul to Neo soul  Done
  • Lead could do with expanding; maybe mention the title info in it and definitely for the tour info.  Done Expanded it.
  • Also, split it into two paras, though my suggestions may change/new ones could be introduced after you have done this.  Done
  • Remove wikilink on studio album  Done
  • Labels are in the wrong order; do same order as in the infobox.  Done
  • "Musically, Lucid is a" → "Musically, the album is a"  Done
  • "The album is a departure from" → "It is a departure from"  Done
  • "in that it is more personal" → "due to being more personal"  Done
  • Target political to Music and politics  Done
  • "It was primarily produced by" → "The production was primarily handled by"  Done
  • I think after this sentence, you should start para 2?  Done
  • Target ballads to Sentimental ballad  Done
  • "The album explores topics such" → "The lyrics explore topics such"  Done
  • Mention at the end of the singles sentence that they were in 2019  Done
  • "It received positive reviews" → "The album received generally positive reviews"  Done
  • Target music critics to Music journalism  Done
  • "and considers it to be her" → "and considered it to be her"  Done
  • "most emotionally robust record to date" → "most emotionally robust record" as "to date" is not needed, especially when she may later release more  Done Removed "to date".

Background and promotion

[edit]
  • "Aṣa took a 5-year hiatus" → "Aṣa took a hiatus of five years" per MOS:NUM  Done
  • "music prior to unveiling plans to" → "music, prior to unveiling plans for releasing"  Done
  • "She told France 24 she spent" → "To France 24, she recalled having spent"  Done
  • "she announced the album's title" → "Aṣa announced the album's title"  Done
  • "she said the album's title depicts the place" → "she said the title Lucid depicts the place"  Done
  • "She also said some of the album's songs" → "Aṣa also said some of the songs"  Done
  • "her flat in Paris while others" → "her flat in Paris, while others" with the appropriate wikilink shown here  Done
  • "she said she wrote the album" → "she stated to have wrote the album"  Done
  • "plans for the album's release" → "plans for the release of Lucid"  Done
  • "to her critically acclaimed" → "to Aṣa's critically acclaimed"  Done
  • "Musically, it is a" → "Musically, the former is a"  Done
  • Are you sure the above sentence shouldn't be in the Composition section instead?  Done Removed to the music and lyrics section.
  • [1][4][2] put in numerical order  Not done Don't know how to do this.
  • "previous albums in that it is" → "previous ones, in that it is"  Done
  • Target political to Music and politics  Done
  • This sentence is fine here despite discussing subject matter, since it is about the Background of the album  Done
  • The following three sentences; shouldn't they be in the Composition section instead?  Done Removed to the music and lyrics section.
  • "drummer Marlon B and contains" → "drummer Marlon B, and contains"  Done
  • Target neo-soul to Neo soul  Done
  • [4][2] put in numerical order  Not done Don't know how to do this.
  • Target ballads to Sentimental ballad  Done
  • "in support of the album" → "in support of Lucid" and mention the tour year in this sentence  Done added the month and year the tour commenced at the beginning of the sentence
  • "in major cities in" → "in major cities of"  Done
  • Target Eko Convention Centre to Eko Hotels and Suites  Done

Composition

[edit]
  • Retitle to Music and lyrics  Done
  • "The album's opener "Murder in the USA", a" → "The opener of Lucid, "Murder in the USA", a"  Done
  • "it makes references to police" → "it makes references to police"  Done I don't see a difference
  • "which narrates the story" → "that narrates the story"  Done
  • "said her mother's abusive relationship with her father" → "said the abusive relationship between her mother and father"  Done
  • "who offered an advice to" → "who offered advice to"  Done
  • Target Afropunk.com to Afro-punk  Done
  • Target vocal tone to Tone (linguistics)  Done
  • Wikilink pop-soul to itself  Done
  • "she cites arguments and" → "Aṣa cites arguments and"  Done
  • "is reminiscent of songs produced" → "is reminiscent of tracks produced"  Done
  • "about her desire to rip her" → "about a desire to rip her"  Done
  • "puts her through a heart break" → "puts her through a heartbreak"  Done
  • [6][2] put in numerical order  Not done Not sure what you want me to do here; I cannot swap both sources.
  • Remove wikilink on jazz  Done
  • "her worries and documents the" → "her worries, and documents the"  Done
  • Target uptempo to Tempo  Done
  • Remove wikilink on sentimental ballad  Done
  • Target Yoruba to Yoruba language  Done
  • "draining 5-year relationship" → "draining relationship of five years"  Done
  • "the strength she endured after the emotional turmoil she's been through" → "the strength that she endured, after having been through emotional turmoil"  Done
  • "The closing track "My Dear" is" → "The closing track to Lucid, "My Dear", is"  Done
  • "to "Happy People"; Aṣa sings" → "to "Happy People", with Aṣa singing"  Done

Singles

[edit]
  • "The album's lead single "The Beginning" was" → "Lucid's lead single, "The Beginning", was"  Done
  • Mention what format the release was; do this for the other two singles as well  Not done Not sure about the format you're talking about.
Versace1608 I mean digital download and streaming, as in formats for release. --Kyle Peake (talk) 08:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "on Instagram prior to releasing it" → "on Instagram, prior to its release"  Done
  • "second single "Good Thing" was" → "second single, "Good Thing", was"  Done
  • "The accompanying music video for the song was" → "The accompanying music video was"  Done
  • Mention that the video was released two months later  Done Added it to the end of the sentence.
  • "who overcomes the urge to overdose" → "who overcomes the urge of overdosing" with the target fixed like this too  Done
  • "the album's third and final single "My Dear", along" → "the third and final single, "My Dear", along"  Done

Critical reception

[edit]
  • "received positive reviews from" → "was met with generally positive reviews from"  Done
  • Remove what was praised, specifically, as that should solely be in the lead.  Done
  • Refs do not need to be at the end of the opening sentence because the section backs up that  Done Removed refs.
  • "awarded the album a rating of 7.5 out of 10, commending Aṣa for documenting" → "commending the album for showing Aṣa documenting"  Done
  • "perspectives while criticizing the record" → "perspectives, though criticized it"  Done
  • "Chuks Nwanne of" → "Chuks Nwanne from"  Done
  • "awarded the album four-and-a-half stars out of five, characterizing it as" → "characterized the album as"  Done
  • "cohesiveness and said the record" → "cohesiveness, and said it"  Done
  • Put The Lagos Review quote into your own words in bits, since the quoting is heavy on this one.  Done Shortened it.
  • "also notes that while it" → "also notes that while the album"  Done
  • "fails to outdo her last offering" → "failed to outdo her last offering with the album"  Done
  • "familiar lines while failing" → "familiar lines, while failing"  Done

Track listing

[edit]
  • Add ref after "All tracks are written by Bukola Elemide." to verify this information.  Done
  • Are you sure you can't add producer info somewhere in this section?  Done I added additional info.

Personnel

[edit]
  • Add a ref at the top of this section, that the credits are adapted from.  Done

Release history

[edit]
  • How is this various when the ref only sources a US release? Response: It was released in other regions other than the U.S. Do you want me to clutter the article with multiple iTunes links? I can do that if that's what is required.
  • Use the proper column for ref; see Jesus Is King for example.  Done
  • Chapter Two Records → Chapter Two  Done
  • Wagram MusicWagram  Done

References

[edit]
  • Make sure all of these are archived using the tool.
  • Copyvio score looks good at 31.5%
  • Date formatting needs to be the same for all refs; use the May 2, 2020, since that is preferable for the musician's nationality.
  • Similarly, author layout needs to be consistent on all refs; probably cite the first name followed by last, since that's how most are currently.
  • Cite OkayAfrica as publisher on ref 1 instead, with the wikilink
  • Cite Pulse Nigeria as publisher instead on refs 6, 8 and 11
  • MOS:QWQ issues for ref 9's title
  • Cite Okayplayer as publisher on ref 10 instead, with the wikilink and fix MOS:QWQ issues in the title
  • Cite Afropunk.com as publisher on ref 12 instead, with target to Afro-punk
  • MOS:QWQ issues for ref 13's title
  • Cite Apple Music as publisher instead on ref 16, with the wikilink
  • Target Guardian to The Guardian (Nigeria) on ref 18 and fix MOS:QWQ issues in the title
  • Delete Medium ref 21 since that is unreliable per WP:SELFPUB and replace or remove the info sourced from that
  • MOS:QWQ issues for the titles of refs 23 and 24
  • You should merge multiple countries' Apple Music on the citation of ref 25 to verify it was a various release.

Final comments and verdict

[edit]
Medium is not a reliable source, it is a blog. Should be removed. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
MarioSoulTruthFan Thanks for that reminder! --Kyle Peake (talk) 08:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Versace1608 I may have to fail this soon if you haven't responded to the issues soon since it's been on hold for a while now. --Kyle Peake (talk) 16:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Fail will have to be given to this article unfortunately, due to it having the construction template planked on while the nominator has yet to respond to certain issues, meaning that the article comes under the immediate failure criteria. --Kyle Peake (talk) 11:06, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the GOCE copyedit request

[edit]
  • Lucid utilizes piano-led ballads, strings and soft brass to tell a tale of the brokenhearted. Emphasis in original. Does the album tell one continuous story or does each track have its own?
  • The lyrics explore topics such as love, heartbreak, self-discovery, empowerment, joy, pain and identity. I'm not sure I understand the reason for wikilinking these themes.
  • On France 24, she recalled spending time away from the spotlight in an attempt to "live normal". Slightly edited. "Spotlight" is more of a colloquialism. Perhaps we can use something more neutral and formal? It'd be helpful if it were more narrowed down: something like "social media" or "publicity events".
  • She also stated to have written the album like a diary and poured all of her joy, heartbreak, laughter and longing on it. This might be better off as a direct quote or re-written; it does not fit the Wikipedia's tone as it is.
  • Prior to unveiling plans for the release of Lucid [...] Is it plans about the album or the album itself? I don't understand the importance of the plans to promote something rather than the thing itself.
  • Lucid utilizes piano-led ballads, strings and soft brass to tell a tale of the brokenhearted. Emphasis in original. Same question as the first one.
  • In "The Beginning", Aṣa implores her love interest to restart with her. As in start the relationship again, or just reconcile as friends?
  • "Makes No Sense" provides a dose of self-awareness and portrays Aṣa as someone who has been hurt, neglected and rejected by her love interest. This sounds too casual. Going to come back to this later to reword it.
  • "365" documents the end of a five-year emotionally-draining relationship; the song features violin and guitar strings. Why are "strings" mentioned here? Can we refer to them as just "violins" and "guitars"?
  • "9 Lives" is a message to Aṣa's former lover on the strength that she endured, after having been through emotional turmoil. Awkward wording. Will come back to this later.
  • The accompanying music video was directed by Sesan and released two months later; it is entirely a combination of subplots. Subplots need a plot to be compared to in order to exist. Are they connected? If not I suggest using the word "vignettes".
  • Music critic Dami Ajayi criticized Aṣa for toying familiar lines, while failing to take new in-roads. I'm not sure what you mean by this; could you please clarify?

Looking forward to your responses. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 20:16, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tenryuu: Thanks for performing copyedits to the page. While I appreciate your efforts, I must point out that your comments look more like a review than a copyedit. This is my first time seeing a copyedit request transform into a full-length review. Having said that, I am going to address some of your concerns.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 01:38, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Versace1608, as I haven't seen this being updated in a while, I'll consider the copyedit request complete. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lucid (Aṣa album)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 16:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This will be my first review in a while, let's see how it goes. Skyshifter talk 16:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Versace1608: pinging you just to make sure you're aware of the review (in that case, please respond here). I just saw you haven't edited in a month. I'll get to it this week. Skyshifter talk 12:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I just read your messages. Please let me know if you need me to address anything relating to the article.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 16:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's begin.

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Infobox seems good; image has a valid non-free use rationale
  • I think the general structure of the lead can be improved, since it doesn't read very good in my opinion. Right now, it has too many separated, short sentences that start the same. Taking the first paragraph, "It was [...] It is [...] It is [...] The [...] The [...]", and in the second paragraph, apart from the very first word, all sentences start with "The". I recommend merging some of the sentences and doing some different structures to allow for a more dynamic reading. For example, "It was released" could be merged with the previous sentence.
  • "The production was primarily handled by drummer Marlon B and contains additional elements of jazz, reggae and neo-soul." — I don't think the "and contains additional elements of jazz, reggae and neo-soul" fits here. This should be merged with the "It is a soul, folk, and rock album [...]" sentence (will also be noted below).
  • "The album's title depicts the place where she is currently at in her life." — temporal words like "currently" should be avoided, especially since 2019 was a long time ago. This should be reworded to something like "The album's title depicts the place where she was at the time of the album's release." (will also be noted below)
  • "The album received generally positive reviews from music critics, who commended the symbolic nature of Aṣa's songwriting and considered it to be her deepest and most emotionally robust record." This part in italics doesn't seem to be cited in the article.
  • "The album was supported by a Lucid album tour" — feels a little too repetitive, could just be "The album was supported by a tour"

Background and promotion

[edit]
  • "Aṣa took a five-year hiatus from music before revealing plans to release Lucid." — should mention her previous release here (like "After releasing Bed of Stone in 2014, [sentence])
  • "[...] the title Lucid depicts the place where she is currently at in her life." — remove "currently"; same suggestion I made in the section above
  • "Prior to releasing Lucid, Aṣa released the singles [...]". — could just be replaced with the Singles section since singles it's part of promotion, Singles isn't a big section and it doesn't fit well after the music and lyrics section. (Will also be noted below)
  • "Aṣa was scheduled to headline the Asa Live in Lagos concert" — just want to confirm, shouldn't it be Aṣa Live in Lagos?
  • "[...] due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic" — remove ongoing to avoid temporal words

Music and lyrics

[edit]
  • If you added Bed of Stone in "Background and promotion", remove "and is a follow-up [...]". I think it fits better there
  • "and contains additional elements of jazz, reggae, and neo-soul." — merge with the previous sentence mentioning the genres; same suggestion I made in "Infobox and lead"
  • In the 3rd paragraph there are three sentences in sequence starting with "In"
  • Leslie Addo -> Leslie Addo of Pop Magazine

Singles

[edit]
  • Could be merged with "Background and promotion", as said above

Critical reception

[edit]
  • The album is always cited either as "the album" or "Lucid", can try other words like "the work" for variation
  • Music critic Michael Kolawole -> Culture Custodian's Michael Kolawole (or similar)
    • Same thing for Dami Ajayi. Write the publisher's name.
  • "In a review for The Lagos Review" — unfortunately not the best place to use "in a review" since the website also has review in the name, so could do another variation like "Writing for The Lagos Review" for less repetitiveness

Track listing

[edit]
  • The "all_writing" also including the producer won't work because the template adds a dot at the end, creating a .[4]. I recommend just writing "All tracks are written by Bukola Elemide [...]" at the start of the section

Personnel

[edit]
  • "primary artist" is usually "performer"

Release history

[edit]
  • Seems good

References and other comments

[edit]
  • No copyvio, the links at the top just copies of this article
  • Ref 17: change work to [[The Guardian (Nigeria)|The Guardian]]
  • Ref 19: change work to "The Guardian"
  • Refs 20 and 21: change " to ' in title per MOS:QWQ
Spotchecks

Final comments

[edit]

 On hold. Skyshifter talk 01:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Versace1608: Pinging since it's been 8 days. Skyshifter talk 19:56, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Fail 11 days since my last ping (19 since the article was put on hold), and no response. Skyshifter talk 17:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lucid (Aṣa album)/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Versace1608 (talk · contribs) 20:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: BlondArkhangel (talk · contribs) 06:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to review this article, which talks about the album Lucid by Asa --BlondArkhangel (talk) 06:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)BlondArkhangel[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: