Talk:Luxury box

Seating Chart Ommision

Why are luxury boxes usually ommitted from seating charts?--BigMac1212 03:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Because only tickets on general sale normally make up seating charts. The same way team seats aren’t included. Jo Jc Jo (talk) 22:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Stadium with most luxury boxes

The stadium with the most luxury boxes is Texas Stadium with 360. Is this only inside the US? There are stadiums outside the US like the Estadio Monumental "U" that have over 1250 luxury boxes.MicroX 01:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Merge Discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was no consensus Barte (talk) 23:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Both of the articles are very small, and the definitions are virtually identical - a luxury spot in an entertainment center intended for viewing and that's usually higher up and more roomy and comfortable, sometimes well decorated or well stocked with food. The only distinction is that one is more modern and one more old. The luxury theater box should be joined to this article. What do others think of this? There has to be some agreement before anyone makes this merge.--ɱ (talk) 23:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure these are closely enough related to be merged--because the venues and consequences are so different. Per Luxury box, a sports venue box often contains TV monitors, glass panels, a bar, and more--none of which are found in a theater box. There are financial differences: luxury boxes are leased, with revenue kept by the home team. They are controversial: some argue that other seats are further from the playing field as a result. None of this holds for a theater. Bottom line: I think this is a "see also" cross-reference.Barte (talk) 17:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is now a year old. I don't see any consensus and propose closing. Barte (talk) 14:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Luxury box. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121011115013/http://www.seattlepi.com/basketball/270255_nbasonics15.html to http://www.seattlepi.com/basketball/270255_nbasonics15.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Removed single event sales section

I’ve removed the section on pricing as I don’t think it serves any purpose. By the author’s admittance, it is WP:ORIGINAL research. It is also hugely varied on location, stadium, event type, box type, country and owner. I don’t think it adds anything to the article and could in fact be misleading. Jo Jc Jo (talk) 22:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

"Marketing and exclusivity"

I'm trying to work out what "exclusivity" means in this section header, and it is in no way addressed in the text that follows. (Then again, there isn't much about marketing either.) Perhaps a different name for this section? In any case, if some group of people are any more "excluded" than the usual situation where you are "excluded" in sitting in someone else's seat, we should spell it out. - Jmabel | Talk 22:02, 27 May 2023 (UTC)