Talk:Macrocystis

Protista Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Algae Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Untitled

I am fairly new to wikipedia. Is this site (Macrocystis) to be kept/ deleted/extenged- grown-up! Osborne 15:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot-generated content

A computerised algorithm has generated a version of this page using data obtained from AlgaeBase. You may be able to incorporate elements into the current article. Alternatively, it may be appropriate to create a new page at Macrocystis (alga). Anybot (contact operator) 15:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

I would like to know why the biota infobox on this page differs from all other biota pages in having a Domain as its root. I would also like to know why there is a phyllum in this box -- is it simply because you had the data, and didn't for some other species (Lion)? We might have access to a large amount of phyllum classification via ETHAN, to which I have programmatic access. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leegee23 (talk • contribs) 07:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Macrocystis integrifolia and Macrocystis pyrifera into Macrocystis

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge Macrocystis integrifolia and Macrocystis pyrifera into Macrocystis given that the genus is monospecific. Klbrain (talk) 13:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Has been made monospecific in 2010 Artoria 2e5 🌉 04:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Algaebase seems to agree. --awkwafaba (📥) 15:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Algaebase, which has since percolated through most other applicable DBs (e.g. WoRMS). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Libcub (talk) 02:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think, now that several months have gone by since the initial proposal with no opposition to a merge, you're clear to move forward with this. Pinging @Artoria2e5: as the originator of the idea. Joyous! | Talk 05:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not gonna be a quick job, but I will try! Artoria 2e5 🌉 15:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Macrocystis laevis

Macrocystis laevis C.H.Hay was described in 1986. Distribution is now probably by mistake referenced "Abbott, 1976". Schiel & Foster, 2015, ISBN 978-0-520-27886-8, on pages 6 and 13 assert distribution only from sublittoral of Marion Island as like as AlgaeBase: Macrocystis laevis C.H.Hay. -xfi- (talk) 12:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]