Talk:Magnum Cum Louder

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Magnum Cum Louder is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Magnum Cum Louder/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article now contains: an infobox (including a link to an independent, professional review), complete tracklisting (with songwriter information) for both original and 2005 releases, details of singles related to album (including chart positions), two versions of album cover, full personnel (not just band members), a brief description and a reference section. Could be improved further by more track discussion, and a quote. I have recently contributed to this article and may be biased.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==Re-reassessment, implementing new criteria== Article requirements:
Y Categorisation: at least by artist & year (start +)

Y Infobox: relatively complete (start +)
Y Cover? (C or B)
Y Completed, with most technical details? (B)

Track listing: song titles (start +)
Y Track lengths and authors? (C or B)

Y Personnel: primary performers mentioned by name (start+)
Y Personnel section? (C or B)
Y All musicians? (C or B)
Y Technical personnel? (B)

Y Sections: lead section providing based overview (start+)
Y Lead comply with WP:LEAD? (length and scope) (B)
N Other section(s) of useful prose? (C or B)
Y No obvious extraneous information (such as "trivia") (B)

Y No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. (b)

The only things unsourced is the trivia about the title track and the info about Thank God You're Here. It needs way more prose to be expanded into a b article. 99.246.1.192 (talk) 23:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 22:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magnum Cum Louder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071205184453/http://www.apra.com.au/cms/worksearch/worksearch.srvlt?action=workSearch to http://www.apra.com.au/cms/worksearch/worksearch.srvlt?action=workSearch

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]