Talk:Manito Park

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 28 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Manito Park and Botanical Gardens to Manito Park. The result of the discussion was moved.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manito Park and Botanical Gardens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322014412/http://www.spokesmanreview.com/allstories-news-story.asp?date=051604&ID=s1519948 to http://www.spokesmanreview.com/allstories-news-story.asp?date=051604&ID=s1519948

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manito Park and Botanical Gardens → Manito Park – The name is simply "Manito Park" on all signs posted within the park, the official city webpage (https://my.spokanecity.org/parks/major/manito/), and the word "botanical" occurs zero times on the 104 page long NRHP nomination form for Manito Park and Boulevard (https://npgallery.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/15000909). Plus, I've never heard it referred to as "Manito Park and Botanical Gardens" in real life, which is obviously not verifiable for Wikipedia standards but a quick google and google news search will back that up. SpokaneWilly (talk) 08:25, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, it is more WP:CONCISE too. PersusjCP (talk) 17:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The current title is too detailed. A more general name would be better. Waqar💬 17:08, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.