Talk:Marian Breland Bailey

Marian Breland Bailey was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 13, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
September 20, 2007	Good article reassessment	Kept
February 21, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 25, 2018, September 25, 2021, September 25, 2022, September 25, 2023, and September 25, 2024.
Current status: Delisted good article

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Preliminary review

The article is well written, with clear prose and correct grammar, complying to style guidelines. It is factually accurate and verifiable, provides references to sources used, cites reliable sources, and contains no original research. Coverage is broad, addressing majors aspects of the biographical and scientific history, staying focused on the primary topic without going into unnecessary details. Perspective is neutral. No controversy is going on regarding the article. All in all, this definitely looks like a good article. Wryspy 17:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Bird Brain?"

Does anyone have any idea as to why a link for a comic charcter known as "Bird Brain" redirects to this page?? Es-won 15:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marian Breland Bailey and her husband Keller had a device called Bird Brain in which a trained pigeon appeared to outsmart people. For the fictional character, go to Bird-Brain with a hyphen in the name. Doczilla 23:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was confused too when I searched for "bird brain", expecting an article relating to bird intelligence to come up, especially since this article mentions nothing about the device. It seems to me that a disambiguation page is more appropriate. —Umofomia (talk) 04:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Pass

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Lara Love 17:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest merge Keller Breland to here

This page has much more detail on this subject than the Keller Breland page, and at first glance, it appears that independent notability for Keller Breland has not been asserted or established. The merge would preserve the infobox and any verifiable content from the current article and be without prejudice, so that the page could be split as and when sufficient verifiable independent material for him is added.

Comments, negative or positive, welcome. --MegaSloth (talk) 15:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Marian Breland Bailey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Marian Breland Bailey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What were B.F. Skinner's "pro-seminars"?

The article mentions these, but doesn't explain what they were. Can't find answer in Skinner's own article, or by googling. Greg Dahlen (talk) 09:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Marian Breland Bailey

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This 2007 Good article has multiple unsourced statements (failing criteria 2) and prose issues, such as puffery, which means this article does not meet WP:NPOV. Spinixster (chat!) 10:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.