Talk:Married to the Sea

Kompressor (musician) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 6 January 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Married to the Sea. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Drew (artist) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 December 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Married to the Sea. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

NatalieDee was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 January 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Married to the Sea. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Comics: Webcomics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.

Married to the Sea (band from Liverpool, England)

Married to the Sea are a band that formed after Liverpool band Milk split-up in 2005. I was just doing a search for "Married to the Sea" the band and this article about "Married to the Sea" the comic came up, and I was just wondering whether or not there should be any reference to the band, or indeed a seperate article concerning "Married to the Sea" the band. Any advice would be appreciated, further reference can be found at http://www.moreweightrecords.com and http://www.myspace.com/marriedtothesealion. Regards Gregmacoy 21:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are so inclined, create an article called Married to the Sea (band) and add a template at the top of this article offering to direct visitors there. If this is going to be a common thing, maybe we should have a disambiguation page instead. White 720 01:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lithograph source

Does anybody know where they get thier lithographs? It would be very interesting information for the article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwink3101 (talk • contribs) 03:43, 30 May 2007

According to the podcast I listened to, it comes from 1800s books and newspapers. He (one of the 3 people who works as "Drew") didn't specify the newspaper but from what I gather it was old Time, Harper's Weekly, London Times, and other similar publications from around the same time period. I'm not sure where the newer material comes from but probably similar, newspapers, or mags, etc. Maximumenjoyment (talk) 19:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Dee Merge

I do not believe that a merge is acceptable. Married to the Sea and NatalieDee are quite obviously not the same thing or even related. The only way they are remotely connected is that their creators happen to be married. Take a look at this graph of the Unique hits to Married to the Sea and NatalieDee. Compare.com Site Analytics You can see that NatalieDee is clearly more popular. And to prove notability here she is compared to Diesel Sweeties and Ctrl Alt Del - Site Analytics - Webcomics which have Wikipedia articles and NatalieDee beats them hands down based on unique traffic and therefore NatalieDee is worthy of its own article. I have also added sources to NatalieDee from Entertainment Weekly and The Daily Gamecock as proof that the article is notable. Spastic on elastic (talk) 12:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I totally agree. I think it's kinda sexist that Toothpaste gets its own article but Natalie Dee doesn't...? 216.231.36.191 (talk) 00:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Running fan count

It is noted that Natalie Dee has a popular Facebook site. Do we really need to keep a running count of exactly how many fans there are at any given time? "This page has over 2500 fans." How about we kill this line? Doesn't seem appropriate in an encyclopedic entry.Keithh (talk) 15:07, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

redirect from dog traders

the page dog traders redirects here, dog traders is a band wille apparently closely associated with the comic it is still a separate entity --Kateweb (talk) 11:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

identity

The article is written to indicate that "Drew Fairweather" and "Natalie Dee" are these peoples' legitimate names... this is not likely to be the case and should be clarified. As far as I know their actual identities are generally unknown. 74.140.254.131 (talk) 18:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added info on the

Possible tall tales from Drew

Since Drew is a well-known troll known to tell ridiculous tales and say outlandish things (go look at his twitter if you don't believe me), I believe some of the content is dubious in the paragraph about Drew, especially the stuff sourced from podcasts. I do not think he can be considered a reliable source about himself, and in any case, WP:THIRDPARTY applies (him saying things about himself is first-party, technically). --70.185.221.158 (talk) 19:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Married to the Sea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Call to Insert both Drew Fairweather and Natalie Dee into Wikipedia

Both Drew and Natalie have had an extreme effect on internet culture. From their Webcomics, to their Youtube Channels, to their Podcast, to their offerings to the nail polish world, to their Musical offerings with the efforts of CrudBump and KOMPRESSOR and others, to the efforts of DaShareZone and others. There are SEVERAL different entries to Wikipedia which all reference Drew or Natalie as links for more information, yet which all impotently link here, the work they were first known for. I myself am writing this because I wish to know more about these great artists yet I am frustratingly brought back here multiple times when trying to learn about them. It's time to compile what Wikipedia knows about them into their own articles. The sheer pattern with which they seek to anonymously create something new and the make it into something notable (as seen with crudbump, KOMPRESSOR, and Dasharezone, all efforts which were anonymously started but once gained traction indicated they were credited by at least 1 of these two artists) forces them them into obscurity, yet they are notable creators which deserve their own entry of knowledge to catalogue what they have made. These folks have actual products which can be purchased currently by me or you - they have successfully Kickstarted multiple projects to be sent to me or you! Based only on what we know they have created now, they are noteworthy enough for their own articles, yet still their pattern of obscure creation leads us to believe there are yet many more content we know and love which are yet to discover that are ALSO created by them! 2600:1700:970:5280:9C66:2239:66DA:B5D7 (talk) 02:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)refleksy[reply]

I'm one year late but I absolutely agree! Flamingolegz (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]