Talk:Marshall Plan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marshall Plan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

Marshall Plan is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 22, 2006.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 15, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
September 18, 2005	Featured article candidate	Promoted
May 7, 2010	Featured article review	Demoted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 3, 2004, June 5, 2004, April 3, 2005, April 3, 2006, April 3, 2007, April 3, 2008, April 3, 2009, April 3, 2010, and April 3, 2015.
Current status: Former featured article

This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

European history High‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism High‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States History High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Archives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of National Archives project, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National ArchivesWikipedia:WikiProject National ArchivesTemplate:WikiProject National ArchivesNational Archives

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Public opinion data on the Marshall Plan

^[1]

^[2]

^[3]

^[4]

^[5]

^[6]

Eliannalandau (talk)

Notes

References

^ Lukacs, John. “A LOOK AT . . . THE LEGACY OF THE MARSHALL PLAN.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 25 May 1997, www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1997/05/25/a-look-at-the-legacy-of-the-marshall-plan/47b5b44c-e1eb-4c68-bd46-5a29c5c76c73/?utm_term=.b758f5822e5f.
^ Machado, Barry. “Selling the Marshall Plan.” The George C. Marshall Foundation, George C Marshall Foundation, marshallfoundation.org/library/digital-archive/selling-the-marshall-plan-chapter-2-monograph-collection/.
^ National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. Foreign Affairs Survey, Jun, 1952 [survey question]. USNORC.520327.R16. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL [distributor], accessed Oct-13-2017.
^ National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. Foreign Affairs Survey, Mar, 1949 [survey question]. USNORC.490164.R11. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL [distributor], accessed Oct-13-2017.
^ Gallup Organization. Gallup Poll, Feb, 1948 [survey question]. USGALLUP.030348.RT07C. Gallup Organization [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL [distributor], accessed Oct-13-2017.
^ Gallup Organization. Gallup Poll (AIPO), Sep, 1941 [survey question]. USGALLUP.41-248.QKT09. Gallup Organization [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL [distributor], accessed Oct-13-2017

Committee for Economic Development

No idea where to work this in, but from that article: The CED has been credited with helping to create the Bretton Woods Agreement, the Employment Act of 1946 (and therefore the Council of Economic Advisers and the Joint Economic Committee) and the Marshall Plan.^[1]^[2] valereee (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Mudge, Stephanie L. (30 May 2019). "Commentary: An Alliance Between Big Business and Democratic Socialists Isn't as Unlikely as It Sounds". Fortune. Retrieved 2022-01-30.
^ Allott, Daniel (2020-01-21). "Capitalism must meet the challenge: Prosperity for all Americans". The Hill. Retrieved 2022-01-30.

valereee (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Its role in rapid recovery has been debated."

never underestimate the psychological fuel you give to a desperate population with the knowledge that someone is helping you. (no refs required). on another note, the article repeatedly says france and uk received less aid than germany, yet when one totals up the figures from the two tables one gets the following: grants/loans - germany 1,390.6, france 2,713.6, uk 3,189.8. expenditures - germany 1,448, france 2,296, uk 3,297. totals: germany 2,838.6, france 5,009.6, uk 6,486.6. germany received 57% of the aid given france, and almost 44% of the aid given the uk. what am i missing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.36.71 (talk) 21:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Broken File

PDF file for Public Law is broken. Idk why or how. A. Rosenberg (talk) 17:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Lukacs, John. “A LOOK AT . . . THE LEGACY OF THE MARSHALL PLAN.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 25 May 1997, www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1997/05/25/a-look-at-the-legacy-of-the-marshall-plan/47b5b44c-e1eb-4c68-bd46-5a29c5c76c73/?utm_term=.b758f5822e5f.

[2] Machado, Barry. “Selling the Marshall Plan.” The George C. Marshall Foundation, George C Marshall Foundation, marshallfoundation.org/library/digital-archive/selling-the-marshall-plan-chapter-2-monograph-collection/.

[3] National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. Foreign Affairs Survey, Jun, 1952 [survey question]. USNORC.520327.R16. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL [distributor], accessed Oct-13-2017.

[4] National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. Foreign Affairs Survey, Mar, 1949 [survey question]. USNORC.490164.R11. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL [distributor], accessed Oct-13-2017.

[5] Gallup Organization. Gallup Poll, Feb, 1948 [survey question]. USGALLUP.030348.RT07C. Gallup Organization [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL [distributor], accessed Oct-13-2017.

[6] Gallup Organization. Gallup Poll (AIPO), Sep, 1941 [survey question]. USGALLUP.41-248.QKT09. Gallup Organization [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL [distributor], accessed Oct-13-2017

[:1-7] Mudge, Stephanie L. (30 May 2019). "Commentary: An Alliance Between Big Business and Democratic Socialists Isn't as Unlikely as It Sounds". Fortune. Retrieved 2022-01-30.

[:0-8] Allott, Daniel (2020-01-21). "Capitalism must meet the challenge: Prosperity for all Americans". The Hill. Retrieved 2022-01-30.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[1]

[2]