Talk:Mary Surratt/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DrStrauss (talk · contribs) 18:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

On hold, see 2. b.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   See the on hold comment for 2. b.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Placing on hold due to sub-criterion b. The last paragraph of "Civil War and widowhood" could be made clearer or better in terms of inline citations.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   No issues.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   No issues.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No issues.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Excellent use of images, extensive but not excessive.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold, see 2. b.

@DrStrauss: Let me know if the change I made is acceptable to you. MagicatthemovieS (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.