Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Massively parallel (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Real life examples please? Or is this still a purely theoretical concept? --I am not good at running 21:02, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The term definitely exists, but a redirect to Parallel computing may be more appropriate than a dedicated article Blufive 21:10, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL Addhoc 19:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Integrate in "parallel computing" article?

[edit]

There seem to be little confusion in this area: there is an article about "massively parallel" and another one about "massive parallelism" - both should be joined, also the acronym "MPP" = massively parallel processor is missing and should be added!?

[edit]

As I read through your "Massively Parallel" references, I noticed the link to a commercial web site under "ultra high throughput DNA sequencing". Solexa Inc. has recently commercialized a DNA sequencing technology that is 10X the throughput of existing technologies plus we have some nice graphics describing the technology on our home page. Is it possible to create a choice of web links under "ultra high throughput DNA sequencing" to include Solexa.com?

Thanks, Glenn

Glenn Powell Director, Marketing Solexa Inc. gpowell@solexa.com 4.20.166.106 20:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with MPP

[edit]

This article is mostly about computing/processing, so I think overlapping Massive parallel processing might as well be merged here. What do you think? --Kubanczyk (talk) 15:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Massive parallel processing Rijndael (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support. -- samj inout 19:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I support the merging The term massive parallel is not correct English anyway! It should probably be organized under a page: Massively-Parallel Computing which would describe the subject best. Buchs (talk) 16:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article clean up

[edit]

It looks like this article is somewhat neglected, and out of date. It still refers to Ambric, etc. I will try to touch it up. The section "massively parallel chemical reactions" does not seem to fit here. I left a message om Wikiproj medicine. Once that issues with section have been resolved I suggest a move to "massively parallel computing" given the contents, as mentioned in the section above, but probably without a hyphen. History2007 (talk) 19:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]