Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Mathematical Operators (Unicode block)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unicode.org chart PDF file

[edit]

It seems that the contents of the "Unicode.org chart" pdf file (U2200.pdf), which are so very helpful, should become part of the main article. Retaining the downloadable pdf is handy, but I think that information should be searchable within WP and accessible in the main article. If anyone agrees, please feel free! That much formatting is beyond me. :) --Bob Enyart, Denver KGOV radio host (talk) 16:47, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Unicode block which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 November 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Mathematical Operators (Unicode)Mathematical Operators (Unicode block) – I have moved recently this page, the former name being Mathematical Operators. The reason was that a disambiguation from Mathematical operator was needed, as the capitalization of the second word is not sufficient for many readers. Moreover this page is not about mathematics, and contains many glyphs that have never been used in mathematics. So, the title "Mathematical Operators" is misleading, and inadequate per WP:LEAST. An editor remarked on my talk page that Unicodes blocks are generally disambiguated with "(Unicode block)" (see [1]). So, I tried to move the page again, but I cannot, because the new name is a former name of this page, and and editor moved it, apparently because they found disambiguation not useful (to which I disagree). Therefore my request. D.Lazard (talk) 18:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.