Talk:Matt Holliday/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: José Galindo (talk · contribs) 06:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Main review

Overall comments/Misc

• Everything is fine here I liked pretty much the article. It is complete, neutral, with images and with many references. --José Galindo (talk) 23:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

• Copyvio rating: 69.1% chance of violation of this page. But I dont find it a violation because only words and short phrases are copied, not entire paragraphs.

Lead

• Everything is fine here

Background and construction

• My only advice is to review frequently the links.

Controversy

• I dont find a controversy in the article.

Overall review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: (Pass)

Very nice article, deep, complete and maybe with some minors typos but easily to fix. Congratulations to the persons who contributed in the article.--José Galindo (talk) 23:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)