Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Maya Beiser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Maya Beiser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:12, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs to be encyclopedic

[edit]

The article has several warning templates at present. One was "advert|date=November 2017", which I removed after deleting about half the text, which was essentially advertising the subject's wonderfulness. Others remain to be dealt with. The article needs a complete rewrite by someone who cares to and can do it (not me). I do believe the subject is notable. Zaslav (talk) 07:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

[edit]

At least three users who contributed significantly to this article appear to have a close relationship with the subject:

Though the article has been improved (promotional content reduced, shopping links removed, etc.), some (often unsourced) puffery still remains. In my view, in its current form, it should be flagged COI. Superp (talk) 15:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another suspect COI user:

Only ever edited this single article, repeatedly removed maintenance tags. Superp (talk) 13:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the record: Rivera1929 responded on my talk page. Superp (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]