Talk:Medium wave

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Medium Wave or Mediumwave ?

Something in me protests at "Mediumwave" but not at Shortwave, and about Longwave I am not sure. Yes there is inconsistency here, but is it Wikipedia's mission to impose consistency on us all? If so, there are millions of multi-band radio dials displaying MW and FM that we should quarantine.Cuddlyable3 19:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It's non-standard. "Long" and "short" are one-syllable words, but "medium," at three, is not usually turned into a compound. Google searches suggest at least 10:1 in favor of "medium wave." I'll move it. ProhibitOnions ^(T) 08:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medium wave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/62hRKETJE to http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2006/octqtr/47cfr73.44.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Medium wave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2006/octqtr/47cfr73.44.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091008063015/http://www.mwlist.org/ to http://www.mwlist.org/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100902152011/http://www.mwlist.org/mwlist_quick_and_easy.php?area=1&kHz=153 to http://www.mwlist.org/mwlist_quick_and_easy.php?area=1&kHz=153

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Band edges

I have reverted the unsourced changes from 9 April 2024 which originally modified the band edges in the table without modifying the associated channel count and which also then disagreed with the details in the body text. The table details and body text are now consistent again. -- 92.21.137.64 (talk) 09:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]