Talk:Metamaterials Handbook

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Metamaterials Handbook article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Physics: Publications Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Publications Taskforce.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

BTW

Most of the references aren't contributing anything to this article. They are just redundant listing. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 06:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Abductive (reasoning) 07:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the notability criteria for this isn't going to be reliable sources in the mainstream press. If you are so inclined see WP:BK#Academic books and reference 8 of this notability guideline. Hence, CRC press, the publisher, appears to be an academic (or scientific) publisher. This book appears to be listed in a sufficient number of University Libraries, according to WorldCat. It is listed in the Library of Congress [1], [2] per Threshold standards.I doubt the mainstream press is going to provide any kind of focus for these books. This is a "series" based solely on scientific research, written in a review format. In addition, the related (or relevant) peer reviewed research papers, are listed at the end of each chapter. In other words, the content of the book based on primary research. So how do I reference the above as notable for the article? ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 09:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These three references have different summations [3], [4], [5]. I admit one has the same summation as the publisher, which I did not notice earler. However, the publisher summation is not one of these three. The third reference appears to be the same as CRC press (the publisher).

Furthermore, Google books also has a different summation. So counting google books is four references, so far. But I doubt there will be much more than this. Let's face it, this book is not aimed at a general audience. Even the publisher claims [6] to be only aimed at "researchers, academics, professionals, and students". It is a publisher of scientific and technical work, collecting "collect essential reference material and the latest advances" aimed at its audience. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 09:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metamaterials Handbook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314105906/http://www.metamorphose-vi.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=36&Itemid=58 to http://www.metamorphose-vi.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=36&Itemid=58

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]