Talk:Mewati language
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.255.40.89 (talk) 05:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
SOMEbody's paper[edit]
The "Voiced vs. Voiceless" and "Aspirated vs. Unaspirated" sections are obviously inadequately contextualized pieces of somebody's research paper picked up and dropped bodily here. (If the wording weren't enough, the reference to Table II, which doesn't exist here, would prove it.)
Also, WHAT is the point of the previous section on this talk page? Is s/he the author of this Wiki article, or what? GeorgeTSLC (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Why redirected Ahirwati and Mewati are different language and different regions?[edit]
Why redirected Ahirwati and Mewati are different language and different regions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.119.104.226 (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Rajasthan articles
- Low-importance Rajasthan articles
- Stub-Class Rajasthan articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Rajasthan articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Stub-Class language articles
- Low-importance language articles
- WikiProject Languages articles