Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Microalgae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disputed

[edit]

I am not sure that "they are generally more efficient converters of solar energy because of their simple cellular structure" is true; this needs a source. More complex organisms have greater potential for regulation, and thus could potentially be more efficient.

In addition, cells living in water have less access to carbon dioxide, which is not particularly soluble in water. Pcu123456789 05:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"While the mechanism of photosynthesis in microalgae is similar to that of other plants, they are generally more efficient converters of solar energy because of their simple cellular structure." [1] (Page 3) Confuzzle 10:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the single celled microalgae can be among the most productive bio-fuel organisms, by factors ranging from 10 to as much as 1,000 fold, compared to traditional agricultural crops: [http://www.oakhavenpc.org/cultivating_algae.htm Cultivating Algae for Liquid Fuel Production]

Gallons of Oil per Acre per Year
Corn 18
Soybeans 48
Safflower 83
Sunflower 102
Rapeseed 127
Oil Palm 635
Micro Algae 5000-15000

According to: Aquatic Chemistry, CO2 is about 1,000 times as soluable in water as Oxygen or Nitrogen. However, that is only actually achievable when tested at 1 Atm of the same gas - but CO2 is only ~ .04% of ambient air (partial pressure). In addition, CO2 can, apparently, be carried and available in water, attached to numerous "helpers", such as Calcium. --Nekote 01:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thus there is probably less CO2 in water than air. I don't think that the comparison with leafy plants, which require space, is valid. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pcu123456789 (talkcontribs) 06:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It might be worth noting that oxygen is inhibiting to photosynthesis, and, if CO2 is more soluble in water than O2, then aquatic environments might be more favorable for PS than atmosphaeric onces.

Also potentially worth noting in this debate is the fact that even in nonaquatic plants, the CO2 has to pass into water in the plant's cells in order to be utilized. -DF- March 19th 2007

"The solar utilization efficiency of some microalgae is ~ 5%, as compared to ~ 0.2% for typical land based plants." "Aquatic microalgae have been identified as fast growing species whose carbon fixing rates are higher than those of land-based plants by one order of magnitude." At 21 degrees Celcius O2 is 8.9 g/m3 soluble in H20 vs.

                     CO2 is 1.45 kg/m3 soluble in H20 

Therefore; CO2 is much more soluble in water by almost three orders of magnitude! So I am not sure if the first dispute is valid. Sept 2007 129.72.66.120 16:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)FRBurns "Capture and Sequestration of CO2 From Stationary Combustion Systems by Photosynthesis of Microalgae" Takashi Nakamura, et al.[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Microphyte which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content to do

[edit]

Suggestion for content, Are micro algae a certain classification of algae or do they exist across classifications red blue green ect?

Spirulina: Algae or bacteria?

[edit]

Is displaying a picture of spirulina correct? I thought that spirulina is a cyanobacteria, not an algae. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.147.33.106 (talk) 15:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Algae is not monophyletic, it includes basically anything that photosynthesizes and is not a plant. Nessie (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microalgae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What does the name Micro mean in this case? They are only visible with a Microscope?

[edit]

--ee1518 (talk) 11:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]