Talk:Middle Paleolithic
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
what happened before this? 's a good question.
Copyright violations
[edit]Also a lot of the information on this page appears to have been copied and pasted from here so i will remove this information.--Fang 23 (talk) 14:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Done--Fang 23 (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
No animals?
[edit]This article is only about humans. Where there no beast around at the time? --Addingrefs ( talk | contribs ) 22:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
The Middle Paleolithic is a term only used in refrence to human evolution and human cultures. For information on animals that existed during this time see the article on the Pleistocene period.--Fang 23 (talk) 19:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Bandar Abbas museum-Neanderthal child.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Bandar Abbas museum-Neanderthal child.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC) |
Burial for secular reasons
[edit](Total newbie here, actively inviting criticism on protocol.)
The page currently states:
Middle Paleolithic burials at sites such as Krapina, Croatia (c. 130,000 BP) and Qafzeh, Israel (c. 100,000 BP) have led some anthropologists and archeologists, such as Philip Lieberman, to believe that Middle Paleolithic cultures may have possessed a developing religious ideology which included belief in concepts such as an afterlife; other scholars suggest the bodies were buried for secular reasons.
I propose to remove or rephrase the last clause, that other scholars have suggested the bodies were buried for secular reasons. The citations are a link to a search engine, and a book written by Philip Lieberman who asserts an ideological basis for the burials. The word secular refers to a distinction which necessarily did not exist at this point in history, and thus seems unnecessarily contentious given that the significance of the burials is the emergence of ritual and symbolism. The human bodies are laid out and found with burial goods.
The title for the link to the search engine refers to a magazine article[1] discussing cultural exchange between humans and neanderthals. The article refers to Gargett, who argues that the neanderthal bodies may not have been buried deliberately but crushed and entombed in accidents; and also refers to an informal comment from Mussi, saying that she is convinced the early neanderthal burials were deliberate and functional, and that the humans later in the Middle Paleolithic era added the symbolic element. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gfns (talk • contribs) 05:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's highly unlikely that at this period there was a perceived difference between secular and religious. Dougweller (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
References
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Middle Paleolithic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080408032236/http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761566394_12/human_evolution.html to http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761566394_12/human_evolution.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761566394_12/Human_Evolution.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
confused chronology
[edit]until 50 or 30 tya???2A02:8108:9640:1A68:4DF8:A0AF:4F2D:BE71 (talk) 08:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
If we aim to be encyclopedic, and the Middle Paleolithic took place during the Pleistocene period, why is the term "Pleistocene" not mentioned a single time in the text of the current version of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have added a sentence. Dudley Miles (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in History
- C-Class vital articles in History
- C-Class Archaeology articles
- High-importance Archaeology articles
- C-Class history articles
- High-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- High-importance Anthropology articles
- C-Class Evolutionary biology articles
- High-importance Evolutionary biology articles
- WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles