Talk:Mobipocket

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

What is it?

I don't quite understand parts of this article. "Mobipocket Reader, a universal reader for PDAs." So it's software that runs on PDAs, but in what sense is it "universal"? Does it run on any PDA? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tangerine Cossack (talk • contribs) 20:34, 19 November 2007

Mobipocket is may things: A Fileformat, Software, a DRM scheme and an eBook shop. The different aspects of Mobipockt are independed - for example there are quite a few eBook shops apart from Mobipocket to sell eBooks using the Mobipockte Fileformat and DRM Scheme. Also there is Software from 3rd party vendors which can read Mobipockt fileformat.

Now the file format is well documented and can be ported to any PDA. So in theory the any PDA can be used to read Mobipocket files. When it comes to the DRM scheme things look different: You need a licence to implement the DRM scheme. For example Sony was denied the licence and as a result did not add any Mobipocket support to there eBook readers.

And yes that should be all added to the main page. --Krischik ^T 06:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article sucks. It's overloaded with technical jargon, and after sifting through it, I'm still not sure if it is describing a digital file format, a computer algorithm, a piece of software, or a company, . — Quicksilver^{T @} 17:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Implementation section (Android)

The paragraph in the Implementation Section that is devoted to a thinly veiled rant about the lack of support for mobipocket on Android really doesn't fit an encyclopedic article. I rewrote it so that the original point (no support for mobipocket on Android devices) is still there, but less like a personal rant, and more like a note on the matter. I removed the sentence "Some users suggest that this is due to the new owners, Amazon, wishing to maximise sales of their Kindle e-book reader and suggest that the Mobipocket format and software are dying from intentional neglect." because the source it links to is a forum post from someone with no connections to Amazon or Mobipocket SA and is basically ranting about "the man" (in this case "the man" seems to be Amazon). It's an individual opinion and serves no purpose in an article since it's completely hypothetical and not based on actual communication with Amazon. I've also pruned and revised a few other sentences, though not to the degree of the one previously mentioned. 174.112.6.146 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, 174.112.6.146, YOU ARE WRONG You should probably do some research before forming opinions about other people's facts. Amazon sent out an internal note in January to book publishers that Mobipocket is dead. Here's the communique: "To better serve authors, publishers and customers, Amazon is consolidating eBook sales & publishing to the Kindle Platform. Mobipocket will not accept new eBook submissions for sale on Mobipocket.com or its affiliated retailers after Dec 2, 2011 and will stop all sales and remove your existing eBooks after Jan 2, 2012." Here's where you can find one (OF MANY) sources reporting on this fact. RIP: Mobipocket 2000-2011 There are also many news reports of Mobipocket not providing user support nor software updates since 2008. I am a long time user of Mobipocket and have been stymied since the day Amazon bought and killed Mobipocket....and having your condescending platitudes that Mobipocket is alive and well is, frankly, galling. Please allow Wikipedia to correctly reflect the status of events, rather than injecting your shill support for Amazon. N0w8st8s (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)n0w8st8s[reply]

"Hear, hear" As someone who invested US$100 or more in licensed Mobipocket titles (including several Oxford Dictionaries), I've been quite disgruntled about Mobipocket winding down and not building licensed .MOBI file compatibility into the Kindle app for other platforms. My personal feelings as a Mobipocket customer don't belong in the article, naturally, but I do think the article must maintain a neutral point of view. -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 18:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to second the sentiments expressed here. The article as it stands has an almost Alice-in-Wonderland tone to it. For example, it says, "Despite great demand ... Mobipocket has not released a version for Android" [emphasis added] That tense is usually reserved for situations where it would make sense to say "has not yet...". In other words, it implies that Mobipocket might very well go ahead and produce such a version. But that's senseless; it's like saying "King Tut has not visited England" or "Data General has not completed Ada support". It's gramatically correct but none the less incorrect English usage. In all three cases it would be far more appropriate to use did not or never, as in "Mobipocket never released an Android version".
The article also makes the bizarre assertion, "Long term plans for ... Mobipocket ... are in question". This is about as reasonable as asserting "Long term plans for Kaiser Motors are in question". Most of us already got the answer to the question a long time ago.
You may be fooled by the fact that the Mobipocket website is still up, and still has a friendly looking front page. That, too, is rather strange; it's not immediately clear why Amazon wants to keep up the front. If you poke around a little, you'll find that it's had all books, as well as all the old support forums, stripped from it; there's nothing left but the skeleton, and it has been in that state for some years now. Salaw (talk) 23:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WINE

What does not work on Linux using WINE, though? --217.170.134.114 (talk) 16:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Needs overhaul

Article needs to describe the subject in the past tense. Take a look at the mobipocket web site. --Cornellier (talk) 03:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not only is the mobipocket site down, but even Amazon is no longer using mobi files for new books. This is a quote from their support pages: "After August 1, 2021, we will no longer support MOBI files when publishing new or updating previously published reflowable eBooks. Instead, use EPUB, DOCX or KPF formats". It can be found at <https://kdp.amazon.com/en_US/help/topic/G200634390>. WesT (talk) 00:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]