Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Musa al-Sadr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sayyid

[edit]

According to wikipedia, sayyid is an honourific title for those who have Alid blood through their father's side. I'm not sure what place it has on Wikipedia in terms of listing everyone who claims to be a sayyid, such as Musa al-Sadr. Opinions? ناهد/(Nåhed) speak! 14:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In general, it doesn't belong here when used as an honorific, except when it is used in a direct quote. ← George [talk] 13:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Title, not honorific. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.42.187.53 (talk) 15:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It means you have Fatimid blood (not the dynasty, just from Fatima az-Zahra). It's an honourific. ناهد/(Nåhed) speak! 15:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"King", "prince" and "duke" means you have noble blood. They are titles. "Sayyed" also means you have noble blood. It is also a title, not an honorific. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.42.187.53 (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What "official ruling"? Also, King, Prince and Duke are political titles. You do not inherit them because you are the child of a duke, you have to be sworn in as the formal heir and you have property rights and responsibilities under a legal system. Princes are the sons of a king and must also be formally recognised. Any random by-blow of a king is not a prince. Sayyids, meanwhile, are people who claim to be Fatimids/Alids. I think half of Pakistan uses the term to describe themselves. Hence it is an honourific title - it has no special value, it just means you claim a bloodline. ناهد/(Nåhed) speak! 16:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Many princes, barons and counts -most of them- hold the title without having any official political responsibilities. Same with sayyed. Regardless, this issue is not covered by WP:MOSISLAM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.42.187.53 (talk) 16:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have protected this page for three days, or until this dispute is resolved. Please note that the version protected is simply the one I came across — this is not meant as an endorsement of the current revision. Also note that when the protection expires, continued reverts may result in blocks or extended protection/semi-protection. Thanks. Okiefromokla questions? 18:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship with Dr.Shariati

[edit]

Please make note of the fact that Musa Sadr also led the funeral prayers for Dr. Ali Shariati when he "mysteriously" died of a "heart attack" in London, after escaping from Iran.

"The successful concerted effort resulting in securing the transfer of Shariati's body from London to Damascus, Syria, whereupon the renowned Imam Musa Sadr led the funeral prayers" - Source : 'Man and Islam: Dr. Ali Shariati' translated from the Persian by Dr. Fatollah Marjani.

Sayyed Musa and Sayyed Muhammad Baqer

[edit]

Why is the relationship between Sayyed Aqa Musa and Ayatullah Sayyed Muhammad Baqer called a "distant cousin"?? How closer of a cousing can one get that FIRST? Sayyed Musa was the son of Saderddin, while Muhammad Baqer was the son of Heydar. Haydar and Sadredding were brothers!--82.45.249.105 (talk) 00:50, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Born, raised and educated in Iran

[edit]

Ok, can certain individuals cease making what looks as disruptive edits by removing categories and changing ledes even though the article specifically states that he was both born and educated in Iran, with an inline ref? I've several more references now as well. Heck, even his father had already settled in Iran. I'm sure enough bypassing people are willing to assume WP:GF, but please bring it to the talk page if this issue has been playing for longer, or try to search for some references yourself. It'll solve things much more adequately. Thanks - LouisAragon (talk) 07:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Musa al-Sadr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Musa al-Sadr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]