Talk:Nanabozho

Indigenous peoples of North America: Anishinaabe

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anishinaabe, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Anishinaabe peoples on Wikipedia.

Michabo

Originally located at Michabo

This article was nominated for deletion on June 27, 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Sources

Removed the first source as, while interesting, it appeared to have no relevance in any way, shape, or form to the subject of this article. Israelite9191 05:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wisaaka redirect?

How come Wisaaka links to this page? Please clarify Goldenrowley 02:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. It seems all the various claims out there equates Wisaaka with Nanabozho, but it makes more sense for Wisaaka to instead go with Wiisagejaak. CJLippert 23:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that if a trickster story has been influenced by outside sources (Paul Bunyan) that, the 'modern day' made up story must carry a disclaimer. This is important to keep true form of the 'myths' of the Indian that were passed down-an important distinction is made by the disclaimer! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.206.239.159 (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These things tend to be pretty fluid, variable and evolving. North8000 (talk) 04:45, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Handbook of Indians of Canada, Geographic board of Canada, by White, James. (1912) References Nanabozho.
- (https://archive.org/stream/handbookofindian00hodg#page/330/mode/2up) --108.170.134.154 (talk) 02:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- What is the earliest record of the account of Nanabozho? I know that Frederick Waugh was an ethnologist who researched Anishnaabe (Ojibwa) customs in 1916. He mentions the legendary character “Nanabojo” in some of his notebooks. However, I don't earlier sources, sorry. --108.170.134.154 (talk) 02:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Need to Update Article

Is this true?

- "Until about 1850, legends about Nanabozho — also spelled Nanabosho or Nanabush — depicted him as a giant godlike figure. He controlled the seasons, formed the world's natural features and taught the Ojibwa how to hunt, cultivate food, tap maple trees and use healing herbs.

Sometime in the 20th century Nanabozho's persona changed and he became a trickster figure who often took the form of a hare."

- CBC archives
- http://www.cbc.ca/archives/entry/alanis-obomsawin-tells-the-legend-of-nanabozho

According this Wikipedia article the pictograph deceipts Nanabozho. Does that refute that above from CBC?

- Handbook of Indians of Canada, Geographic board of Canada, by White, James. (1912) References Nanabozho.
- (https://archive.org/stream/handbookofindian00hodg#page/330/mode/2up) --108.170.134.154 (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- What is the earliest record of the account of Nanabozho? I know that Frederick Waugh was an ethnologist who researched Anishnaabe (Ojibwa) customs in 1916. He mentions the legendary character “Nanabojo” in some of his notebooks. However, I don't earlier sources, sorry. --108.170.134.154 (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doubly so if you have sources, it sounds like you should be editing the article. North8000 (talk) 01:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

comic drawing of yakari

hello https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakari#Albums it has an album about Nanabozo 85.149.83.125 (talk) 01:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for mentioning this! I've added that to the "In popular culture" section of the article. If you happen to know the year it was featured, it would be a great addition. Thanks again, The Fonz (talk) 04:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]