Talk:Nathan Bedford Forrest

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Secret Societies (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Secret Societies, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Secret SocietiesWikipedia:WikiProject Secret SocietiesTemplate:WikiProject Secret SocietiesSecret Societies articles

Tennessee High‑importance

	Tennessee portal Nathan Bedford Forrest is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Civil War / Military history High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	American Civil War portal This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - American Civil War task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

African diaspora High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 13, 2021.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Statue removed[edit]

ON July 28, 2021 the bust of Nathan Bedford Forrest was removed from the Tennessee State Capital Building. (story here: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/07/22/tennessees-nathan-bedford-forrest-bust-come-down-after-vote/8042280002/ As the page is protected, someone with access needs to update the page.

Fuchs quotation[edit]

'[S]atisfy the basest of conduct' is an odd phrase that Fuchs's editors should have amended ('conduct' should be 'motives'). What the sentence says is correct, but I wonder whether another quotation to the same effect should be substituted because of this lexical error.

Regards to all. Notreallydavid (talk) 01:46, 19 August 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Split?[edit]

I think perhaps we should consider forking the content in the last section to Historical reputation and legacy of Nathan Bedford Forrest. It's a long article and I think posthumous historiography/iconography of Forrest is probably encyclopedic in its own right, distinct from the biography of the man. Thoughts? jengod (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

American duellist?[edit]

What is the basis for including this article in the category American duellist? jengod (talk) 17:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can find, he evaded quite a few scheduled duels through circumstance, or even apologizing, at least once, to a challenger after his temper cooled. I'm not a categories person—the tremendous amount of churn and turnover associated with them would be too nerve-wracking for me—but it seems that he doesn't belong in that category. Is there a "homicidal maniacs" category? He would fit perfectly there.;-) Carlstak (talk) 19:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK I'm going to boldly remove that cat bc while I think he was in many gunfights a duel is a specific ritual thing that doesn't apply here (from everything I've read thus far). jengod (talk) 20:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Useless references[edit]

Several references to "Davison 2016" but no such work listed. Common problem with this method of referencing. DuncanHill (talk) 08:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I went through old revisions and found it. And then corrected it. I've done it as sfn. The article uses a mess of different referencing styles. Personally I loathe all short-form references, but sfn seems to be the one used most recently. DuncanHill (talk) 09:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]