Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Nawab Abdul Latif

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

His comments to Hunter Education Commission

[edit]

In 1882 AD, Nawab abdool luteef, highlighting the social importance of the study of Arabic and Persian, expressed his comments to the Hunter Education Commission as follows: 'Unless a Mohamedan is a Persian and Arabic scholar, he cannot attain a respectable position in Mohamedan society, ie he will not be regarded as a scholar. And unless he has such a position, he can have no influence in the Mohamedan community'.

Source: http://www.banglapedia.org/httpdocs/HT/P_0148.HTM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.121.25 (talk) 00:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.banglapedia.org/httpdocs/HT/L_0141.HTM. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe articles from Banglapedia are not copyrighted entirely, but with paraphrasing and brief quotations is a valid source; if the position of the author is mentioned. 113.11.48.240 (talk) 17:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regards to excessive praise and/or "contributions"

[edit]

Please keep all laudatory statements and opinions within the "Legacy" box, to maintain the integrity of the article. Of course this must be done with valid and/ or active sources. Messiaindarain (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nawab Abdul Latif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]