Talk:New Typesetting System

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Untitled

Please, do not remove this page. The page is simple, I know, but it's the unique reference of NTS.

I fixed up some grammar problems. As for the AfD, I don't see how this is notable yet and will vote to delete it unless something turns up quickly. It sounds like a project that was started over fifteen years ago, yielded "results" (I don't quite know what that means) about ten years ago, and has done nothing since. Are you saying that it set some sort of precedent or model that people look back upon as a reference? Something like that would help, if true. However, if this is just the "unique reference" of a misbegotten software project, then I see no real use for it. J L G 4 1 0 4 16:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Historical TeX reasons

Hi, Saying that it's the one reference I mean exactly this: there is no reference for plain people that explains what is/was exactly NTS. If the system is not currently user, I think it could be historical importance of having it. It's clear that we have to improve this page, but less is empty ;-)

Regards, Xan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xan2 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]