Talk:Next Generation Science Standards

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Emphasis on only 26 states seems misplaced

According to the article in the New York Times,[1] 26 states participated in developing the standards but additional states may adopt the standards. They were, after all, just released this month, right? This WP article makes it sound as if the remaining 24 states have rejected the standards, but it seems like that isn't necessarily so. If it's okay, I'd like to adjust the language a bit. TimidGuy (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I've looked at the sources, I'm starting to think that the wording may not be in accord with the Wikipedia policy of no original research. As far as I can see, none of the sources compare the adoption of Common Core standards with the Next Generation Standards. And the comparison seems problematic, given that it's as yet unknown how many additional states will adopt the standards. TimidGuy (talk) 10:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Fort Mill source indicates that although a state participated in developing the standards, it still remains for the state to adopt the standards. So it's apparently not the case that 26 states have adopted the standards. I think we need to reword this so that it's clear that states are in the process of adopting the guidelines. TimidGuy (talk) 10:57, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

use of "federal-led" in the first sentence

I don't know how the term "federal" made it onto the page for NGSS. The NGSS development process was not a federally led effort, but was primarily funded through the Carnegie Corporation of New York, a well-known philanthropic organization. The science in the standards was based on the National Resource Council's framework, but that is a separate document and was developed through a separate process. I don't know how to edit Wiki pages and because I work for the organization that brought the states and writers together for NGSS development, I don't want to be accused of editing the page myself. Who can help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chad6000 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've edited it. You're free to edit the article yourself. You simply click on the Edit tab. TimidGuy (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Next Generation Science Standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130507001303/http://www.isbe.state.il.us/ngss/default.htm to http://www.isbe.state.il.us/ngss/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Research Design

Teachers perception of the challenges in the implementing next generation science standard. 102.89.46.113 (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]