Talk:Nintendo Space World

Spaceworld 2005?

(70.244.100.3) has stated that there will be a Spaceworld 2005. I can't find anything online besides speculation on forums (Nintendo hasn't posted any press releases on the topic yet). No doubt that this will be confirmed (or denied) in the near future. -JJLeahy 04:31, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The Wii wasn't revealed at a SpaceWorld!!

So I am going to remove it from the list of systems that have been revealed at a SpaceWorld.--Dexter111344 20:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC) == last spaceworld 2000? == the last spaceworld was 2001 not 2000.its when they 1st reveled mario sunshine & zelda:the wind waker.

Any connection to the Nintendo World 2006 trade show?

Both Spaceworld and the current Nintendo World 2006 are very similar, since they are revealing new games during the fall season.

Another meaning

SpaceWorld is also the name of a Norwegian electronics store chain. --Ifrit 13:51, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
http://www.spaceworld.no/

Shoshinkai

Prior to 2000, the SpaceWorld expo was known as the Shoshinkai show. I think this article should make note of that, and correct the bit that says "SpaceWorld 1995" when it should be "1995 Shoshinkai" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.28.254.26 (talk) 22:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

1995 N64 and SM64 demo footage

There are new videos up on YouTube that you guys might find useful for citation:

• Shoshinkai 1995, Nintendo President Yamauchi's opening remarks
• Shoshinkai 1995, Nintendo 64 and Super Mario 64 Demonstrations

For full disclosure I am affiliated with the publication. BcRIPster (talk) 19:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nintendo Space World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nintendo.co.jp/n12/swgbsoft/swgb03.html#gb19

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Shouldn't it be written "Spaceworld"?

All the official references to the name I could find (the Nintendo website and the posters at the events) write it out as "NINTENDO SPACEWORLD". --86.18.248.75 (talk) 12:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Past Tense Phrasing

This event has not occurred in over 15 years, but this page still says "Nintendo Space World is" instead of "Nintendo Space World was". Should this phrasing be changed to past tense so that people can understand that, at this time, this event is no longer happening?Latitude23n (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Subjective Language

There's a bit of subjective language in the first 2 paragraphs that seems somewhat out of place on a Wikipedia page, specifically this sentence:

"Some major exhibits would be teased and then never seen again, leaving fans and press to maintain hype and inquiry for years, as with the spectacular Super Mario 128 demo, the controversial Wind Waker teaser video, Mother 3 (EarthBound 64), and a litany of lost 64DD games."

Opinions such as "spectacular" and "controversial" seem very out of place, as does "maintain hype and inquiry for years"

Just a thought I was having while reading. Could this be reworded to seem less subjective? Yokai64 (talk) 12:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

@Yokai64: Those are not subjective or opinion at all, but objective fact. The WP:LEAD section exists only as a summary of what is already reliably sourced in the body, which it is, because it's true. You didn't even name a reason why you thought it was subjective, but you definitely misread it and projected your mistaken view onto it. The whole point of the extraordinary subject of an entertainment trade show is to create spectacle, and spectacles are spectacular. It's often vaporware though I simply didn't find a source with that particular slang yet. That's not an opinion at all, as the lead already made perfectly clear. An encyclopedic context isn't the hyperbole of an entertainment industry. It doesnt even necessarily mean "good". Words don't get much more inherently neutral than "controversial", as is advised in countless Wikipedia policies. The only thing subjective here is a failure of reading comprehension, sorry. — Smuckola(talk) 12:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm a new contributer to Wikipedia and I'm still learning. I'll take your kind recommendations and go back to my English class. Yokai64 (talk) 13:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

@Yokai64: Ok cool. I tweaked it slightly plus wikilinks, if that broadens the understanding. I'm not sure if I can find the Wikipedia guideline offhand about "describe the controversy" as a basic tenet of neutrality, but maybe WP:NPOVT. That's one of the more advanced ideas for cases where there is no simple right or wrong. Here, it's just basically a wildly mixed reception of love, hate, confusion, and skepticism. In any case, the lead section isn't even meant to be directly cited (WP:LEADCITE) and is just a gross summary of why a person should just read the body, and it isn't responsible if they don't. ;) Thus, the lead is probably the closest thing Wikipedians can get to original prose. Also, Spaceworld is insane. — Smuckola(talk) 14:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Should Kotora get its own wiki page?

Kotora is an electric tiger that was in the prototype of both Pokémon Red & Blue and Pokémon Gold & Silver, but ultimately scrapped in the final version. Many fans has wished this creature would makes a return in the main series due to its round shaped design on top of being cute. It is probably the most known of the unused design, so that makes me wonder if a wiki page would be necessary. Thanzonomo (talk) 09:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

@Thanzonomo: Probably not. WP:N WP:RS — Smuckola(talk) 17:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)