Talk:No. 27 Squadron RAF Regiment

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the No. 27 Squadron RAF Regiment article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Review-Redmarkviolinist

Well, it's been quite a while since I've been on, but I was asked to a review. So here it is, hopefully it will get me back into editing.

You could probably combine the Formation and History paragraphs-they are really quite similar and ambiguous.

In August 1977 the Queen approved the awarding of a Standard to the squadron in recognition of 25 years service. The Queen's name could be clarified. I am from America and have no clue about British Hierarchy, so if someone from a different country was looking at this, they would be able to understand this.

References look good, correct format. You could use some book sources also, but I have no clue how far you are planning on taking this article. If you are looking for GA, then this would be recommended.

Jt NBC Regt changed to the Joint CBRN Regiment. CBRN stands for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear. Look at combining these sentences, just doesn't sound correct.

Be consistent with linking your dates and formatting them. They are all different styles.

In general, the whole page should just be expanded.

You could definitely use images. ṜedMarkViolinist^{Drop me a line} 17:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on No. 27 Squadron RAF Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090501144956/http://www.raf.mod.uk:80/rafregiment/rafregimentsquadrons/27_sqn_history.cfm to http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafregiment/rafregimentsquadrons/27_sqn_history.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]