Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Norfolk Southern Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 8 March 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 00:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Norfolk Southern RailwayNorfolk Southern – Since both the corporation and the railroad are covered in a single article and are largely the same thing, I would propose shortening the title to simply Norfolk Southern. We can use hatnotes to disambiguate any further meaning, if more are needed. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 19:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This entity only ever existed on paper as part of the implementation of the Conrail split. There is very little that can be said about it, and that minimal information should be placed in the NS article, which is where the Pennsylvania Lines LLC rail lines went. I have proposed a merger of New York Central Lines LLC into CSX for the same reason. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 13:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as well as the duplicate stub Pennsylvania CompanyZhing-Za, they/them, 22:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zhing'za zï Ïnin: Sorry, I'd missed this comment and had removed that Pennsylvania Company tag; it's quite a different proposition - if you think that that one, too, warrants a merge, then I think that it's worth starting a separate discussion. It doesn't look like an obvious case to me ... Klbrain (talk) 13:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proseline

[edit]

For the love of all that is holy, please stop making every single added sentence start with "on" or "in". It's poor writing and makes the article look terrible. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

');