Talk:North Carolina Highway 99

North Carolina Highway 99 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 23, 2022. (Reviewed version).

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Roads: State highways / North Carolina Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	North Carolina
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:North Carolina Highway 99/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 05:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'll be reviewing this article. Comments will follow. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments are below, the nomination is

on hold. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very sorry for the delay in getting back to this - your changes look good and I am satisfied with the article overall. I'm happy to give this a pass. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead/infobox

Is there a reason why "circa" is used in the infobox when giving the establishment date of the highway?
- The reason I used circa was because of a discussion here where it was believed that using maps to prove a date of establishment was a W:SYNTH issue. So to avoid that I used the circa. If you disagree, I can remove it.--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Route description

Based on the table in the "Major Intersections" section, it appears the highway begins in Rest Haven; could this be mentioned in the body?

I removed Rest Haven out of the Major Intersections section. On further research, it appears to be a neighborhood located nearby. The area is not incorporated and the nearest CDP is Bayview, but that is a bit away. So I just put "none" for location.--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At times, this section gets a bit repetitive wording-wise, with repeated use of "NC 99" to refer to the highway. I think it would read a bit better if the wording was switched up a bit, although I admit there aren't a lot of alternative wordings to switch to.
- Tried working on this, let me know if anything stands out as remaining repetitive.--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"makes several curves that adjust its direction to an easterly orientation" → would "makes several turns to the east" or "makes several turns and begins running east" convey the same meaning with a simpler wording?
- I liked the wording of the latter, thank you!--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can link U.S. Route 264 at first mention in this paragraph since it's only linked in the lead/infobox previously.
- Done--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
minor, but "Coastal Carolina Railway" is mentioned in the first paragraph and "Coastal Carolina Railroad" is mentioned in the second paragraph
- It was Carolina Coastal Railway, so I fixed the references to the line.--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"1.5 miles (2.4 km) north of Belhaven,..." → MOS:NUMNOTES advises to avoid beginning a sentence with a figure.
- Fixed, apologies, I was not aware of that guideline.--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Several businesses are located in the area surrounding the intersection" → if this is a necessary detail, I think it could be merged with the sentence before it.
- I integrated then and just used the term "central business district" as it does appear to be the central area of commerce.--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History

Do you have any specific dates for when the original NC 99 was decommissioned and the current NC 99 was opened? It reads a little strangely to see that one happened in 1940 and the other one appeared on maps also in 1940.
- I do not, because the only sources that I have from that time are NCDOT maps, of which the old one disappeared and the current one appeared in the same map. I have been unable to find a 1938 map and the 1939 map appears to not show as much detail so NC 99 nor other routes in the region appear. So perhaps a circa would be warranted?--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is meant by "earth road"?
- I think it likely was NCDOT's classification of a dirt road in 1940. I changed it to dirt road and then linked it.--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be accurate to link "topsoil" to Dirt road?
- Done with above--Ncchild (talk) 02:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]