Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Pakistan Muslim League (N)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


N?

[edit]

What's the "N" stand for? Why is it important? —Micahbrwn (talk) 06:54, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It stands for the leader of the party, whose name starts with N.i. e Nawaz Sharif. --SMS Talk 13:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PML-F

[edit]

Why does it state that the PML-F is "the only other known political party besides these two with the PML name"? The link to the Muslim League's general wikipedia entry, no denoting letter, states a couple of others, including the PML-J, among others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homoaffectional (talkcontribs) 17:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June, 2008 elections

[edit]

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) on June 27, 2008, won 3 and 2 five by-election seats, respectively, to the national parliament. Polls were postponed for the 6th seat in Lahore due to Nawaz Sharif's eligibility contest. A court ruled he was ineligible due to the old conviction, amid the government appeal in the Supreme Court, which will hear the case on June 30, thus postponing the vote in the constituency.news.bbc.co.uk, Ruling parties win Pakistan polls The 2 parties also won 19 of 23 provincial assembly seats where by-elections were held. The results will not affect the February 18 general election results in which Benazir Bhutto's PPP won 123 seats in the 342-seat National Assembly and Sharif's party came second with 91, while Pervez Musharraf's party came a poor third with 54 seats. Sharif's Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) won 8 provincial assembly seats, while the PPP won 7 provincial seats.reuters.com, Sharif's party does well in Pakistani by-electionsxinhuanet, Pakistan ruling coalition sweeps by-elections--Florentino floro (talk) 09:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IDU

[edit]

I remove their affliation with the IDU as none is supported by the IDU website Nil Einne (talk) 06:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

[edit]

Islamic Conservatism

[edit]

Link is original research, from a partisan source. reliable sources must be cited. These sources should be directly related to the topic of the article. They should also directly support the information as it is presented. The mentioned link to the claim links back to an opinion piece... analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact. See: Identifying reliable sources. "No original research" is core content policy of wiki. SuperKaran (talk) 20:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How it is OR? Any source for your point? Faizan 07:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I am new to wiki maybe you can help me, but to my understanding, opinion pieces are generally not accepted on Wikipedia. It linked back to a blog piece. I also checked PMLN's manifesto and they do not describe themselves as "Islamic" if anything PMLN's manifesto is secular, has anyone actually read it? or do they just assume since the party calls itself "Muslim" therefore it is "Islamic"? there is a huge difference. SuperKaran (talk) 19:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pakistan Muslim League (N). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Members missing.

[edit]

The total number of members in the party has not been added to the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JacksonFolly (talkcontribs) 13:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Members missing.

[edit]

The total number of members in the party has not been included in the article! JacksonFolly (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2023

[edit]
94.199.17.217 (talk) 06:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: not sure what changes the user requested. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2023 (3)

[edit]

I had pike to edit this page as general qamar javed bajwa is the leader of pmln 2400:ADC7:930:A400:BD83:2779:678D:B6D0 (talk) 10:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

@SheriffIsInTown, the history section includes bias wording such as “The Pakistan Muslim League (N) struck its remarkable, biggest, and most notable achievement in the 1997 parliamentary elections”. More importantly, the 1990 and 1996 elections were dubbed by Dawn and opposition parties as highly rigged and fraudulent in favor of PML-N see here. The section included bias and lacks rigging claims entirely, despite the elections being alleged for rigging. Titan2456 (talk) 19:49, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]