Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Paper Clip

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePaper Clip has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starPaper Clip is part of the The X-Files (season 3) series, a good topic. It is also part of the Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 1 series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 22, 2007Articles for deletionKept
January 13, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 20, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
December 23, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Fair use rationale for Image:Paper Clip 3x02.jpg

[edit]

Image:Paper Clip 3x02.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Paper Clip/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 13:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
Production

Do we have articles on B.C. Museum of Mining and Britannia Beach? Might want to wikilink them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linked Britannia Beach, British Columbia. The mining museum is mentioned there but doesn't have its own article. GRAPPLE X 14:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see about that one..

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Coverage is satsifactory. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mine

[edit]

The mine scene was filmed at the Britannia Mine Museum before the exterior was updated. • SbmeirowTalk02:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]