Talk:Paul London and Brian Kendrick/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am beginning GA review. Please feel free to leave comments regarding the review below. Vicenarian (talk) 05:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Review Result = PASS

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Well-written, I made a few minor grammatical edits.

   B. MoS compliance:

   Complies with MoS, though includes plenty of wrestling jargon - all linked to help the uninformed.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   A wide variety of sources that are reliable in appearance.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Good use of citations, all in appropriate places.

   C. No original research:

   None is apparent.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   A good treatment of the team, no belt left unturned.

   B. Focused:

   Sticks to the team.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   No POV issues.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Not edited since nomination.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Images noted as free.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   I wouldn't mind a few more images of the team in action, but the images illustrate the subjects and are appropriately captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   PASS Well done!

Vicenarian (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC)