Talk:Phil Chisnall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Phil Chisnall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: Second review of HMS Surly (1855)
  • Comment: Eligible per Rule 1d, because it only appeared in the "Recent Deaths" section of ITN and not as a bold link.

5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • checkY Article is long enough (4433 characters), has been 5x expanded according to DYKcheck tool, nominated in time (5x expansion started 5 March, nominated same day) and article is within policy. Eligible as only been on Recent Deaths, not ITN blurb
  • checkY Hooks are short enough, in the article, interesting and well cited. I prefer ALT0 or ALT1, but I leave up to promotor to choose, as all are acceptable
  • checkY QPQ done (it's a 2 article QPQ and this is the 2nd use: ([1]))
  • Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]