Talk:Photo–Dember effect

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Correct casing?

I notice that inside this article, and also in common usage reflected by a web search for the term, photo-Dember is the most common casing of this term, not photo-dember. I noticed that photo-Dember redirects to photo-dember. I have seen one instance where the less common usage was favored in another article linking here. Not a big deal, but I was just curious if anyone knows why the lower case d was favored, even though Dember is the name of the discoverer. CosineKitty (talk) 15:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Corrected. (Perhaps the meaning of Dember was last at some point here). Materialscientist (talk) 00:49, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Change article name?

In a cursory glance at literature on this topic, I noticed that it is usually referred to as the photo-Dember effect or photo-Dember field. General readers who come across the existing name of this article in searches will find it enigmatic (I did); they won't even know what grammatical part of speech it is: noun? verb? adjective? Is photo-Dember a European camera company? A technique for processing digital images? A quality of lighting found in 18th century paintings? I propose that the name of the article be changed to one of the two names above. This will make the topic a little less mysterious and indicate it is in the field of science. --Chetvorno^TALK 08:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]