Talk:Players (2012 film)

Players (2012 film) was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 29, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Central Board of Film Certification#Current certificates|U/A certificate]] The anchor (#Current certificates) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

File:Players 2012 poster.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Players 2012 poster.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remake of the remake?

The article currently states that the film is "Based on the 2003 Hollywood blockbuster, The Italian Job", citing Press Trust of India. I think I've seen another source that agrees with this, ~~but I cannot relocate it~~ - EDIT: found it - it was Business of Cinema, cited elsewhere in the article. However other sources (such as The National, UAE and UrbanAsian) claim it is a remake of the original film. Still others (eg. Cineworld) say it is a remake of The Italian Job without specifying which version.

Can we find a definitive source which establishes for certain which is the case. I'm inclined to think it's based on the original, by my reading of the sources, a Bipasha Basu interview I heard which implied that this was the case and the film's use of original BMC Minis, rather than the BMW MINIs. However, this is somewhat speculative on my part and I would like something more concrete before I make any changes to the article. AJ Cham 17:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC) (edited: 18:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Players (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Secret of success (talk · contribs) 10:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As of this version :

General

References not formatted properly. They require these six fields : Title, url, publisher, author, date and accessdate. Also, the date and accessdate need to be uniformly set up. Newspapers, news channels and magazines need to be italicized.
List of unreliable sources : 12, 16, 26, 34, 36, 44, 52, 54, 58, 61, 63, 65, 69, 71, 74, 90, 92, 94, 97, 98, 101, 103, 105, 107, 108, 112, 120, 122, 123, 157, 164, 174 and 176. Basically the two sites "Bollyspice" and "Glamsham". They need to be replaced.
Poster in the infobox requires an ALT text.
A copy-edit would undoubtedly raise the article, by a significant difference.
Unwanted references exist everywhere, ~~for instance, in the first sentence of the article i. e. The Mid-DAY report clarifies the statement, hence the other two can be removed.~~

Lead

~~The first sentence requires the Indic script to be removed, per consensus at WT:IN.~~
"an all star ensemble cast" - What is "all star"?
~~"gold worth 100 thousand crores" - Currency? Symbol?~~
"double crossed by some of their own team members." - POV

I have done up all the currency and other parts of the article. However, as an editor who has very limited contribution to this article, I would like to point out that the text of the article requires a good deal of clean-up; the prose in several areas sounds poorly written. I hope the nominator can look into that. ~*~Ankit Bhatt~*~ 18:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope so too. I've listed it in WP:GOCE to get it copy-edited and plan to hold the GA review for 30 days, because there seems to be no major contributor to this page. Secret of success (talk) 04:40, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As there has been a very little amount of response to the article, it should be noted that I plan to finish the review within 30 days, and unless someone turns up, I shall be forced to fail the article. Secret of success 08:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is some issue with the twitter link. Ayanosh (talk) 08:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As little response has been shown to this GA, I am failing it for now. This article has several problems, mainly with the prose and the sources. I would suggest that the above problems be fixed, and the article can be renominated after that. Regards, Secret of success (talk) 12:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Players soundtrack.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Players soundtrack.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Players soundtrack.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:19, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]